Cohort enrichment strategies for progressive ...
Document type :
Article dans une revue scientifique: Article original
PMID :
Permalink :
Title :
Cohort enrichment strategies for progressive interstitial lung disease in systemic sclerosis from EUSTAR.
Author(s) :
Hoffmann-Vold, A. M. [Auteur]
Brunborg, C. [Auteur]
Airò, P. [Auteur]
Ananyeva, L. P. [Auteur]
Czirják, L. [Auteur]
Guiducci, S. [Auteur]
Hachulla, Eric [Auteur]
Institut de Recherche Translationnelle sur l'Inflammation (INFINITE) - U1286
Li, M. [Auteur]
Mihai, C. [Auteur]
Riemekasten, G. [Auteur]
Sfikakis, P. P. [Auteur]
Valentini, G. [Auteur]
Kowal-Bielecka, O. [Auteur]
Allanore, Yannick [Auteur]
Hôpital Cochin [AP-HP]
Distler, O. [Auteur]
Brunborg, C. [Auteur]
Airò, P. [Auteur]
Ananyeva, L. P. [Auteur]
Czirják, L. [Auteur]
Guiducci, S. [Auteur]
Hachulla, Eric [Auteur]
Institut de Recherche Translationnelle sur l'Inflammation (INFINITE) - U1286
Li, M. [Auteur]
Mihai, C. [Auteur]
Riemekasten, G. [Auteur]
Sfikakis, P. P. [Auteur]
Valentini, G. [Auteur]
Kowal-Bielecka, O. [Auteur]
Allanore, Yannick [Auteur]
Hôpital Cochin [AP-HP]
Distler, O. [Auteur]
Journal title :
Chest
Abbreviated title :
Chest
Volume number :
163
Pages :
586-598
Publication date :
2022-10-19
ISSN :
1931-3543
English keyword(s) :
clinical trial
enrichment
interstitial lung disease
systemic sclerosis
enrichment
interstitial lung disease
systemic sclerosis
HAL domain(s) :
Sciences du Vivant [q-bio]
English abstract : [en]
Background
Enrichment strategies from clinical trials for progressive systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD) have not been tested in a real-life cohort.
Research Question
Do enrichment strategies ...
Show more >Background Enrichment strategies from clinical trials for progressive systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD) have not been tested in a real-life cohort. Research Question Do enrichment strategies for progressive ILD impact efficacy, representativeness, and feasibility in patients with SSc-ILD from the European Scleroderma Trials and Research (EUSTAR) database? Study Design and Methods We applied the inclusion criteria of major recent SSc-ILD trials (Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Tocilizumab in Participants With Systemic Sclerosis [focuSSced], Scleroderma Lung Study II [SLS II], and Safety and Efficacy of Nintedanib in Systemic Sclerosis [SENSCIS]) and assessed progressive ILD, which was defined as absolute change in FVC and as significant progression (FVC decline ≥10%). Data were compared with all patients and with patients who did not fulfill any inclusion criteria. Results In total, 2,258 patients with SSc-ILD were included: 31.2% of the patients met SENSCIS criteria; 5.8% of the patients met SLS II criteria; 1.6% of the patients met focuSSced criteria, and 67.7% (1,529) of the patients did not meet any criteria. In the first 12 ± 3 months, the absolute FVC decline in all patients and in patients who fulfilled criteria from SENSCIS was –0.1%, in patients who fulfilled criteria from focuSSced was –3.7%, and in patients who fulfilled criteria from SLS II was 2.3%, with accompanying more progressors in focuSSced. The patient populations that fulfilled the different study inclusion criteria significantly differed in various clinical parameters. In the second 12-month period, SENSCIS-enriched patients had a further absolute FVC% decline as described for the total cohort. In contrast, patients who fulfilled the focuSSced and SLS II criteria showed numeric improvement of lung function. There were no significant associations of enrichment criteria and ILD progression. Interpretation The application of enrichment criteria from previous clinical trials showed enrichment for progression with variable success, which led to selected patient populations reducing feasibility of recruitment. These findings are important for future clinical trial design and interpretation of the results of published trials.Show less >
Show more >Background Enrichment strategies from clinical trials for progressive systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD) have not been tested in a real-life cohort. Research Question Do enrichment strategies for progressive ILD impact efficacy, representativeness, and feasibility in patients with SSc-ILD from the European Scleroderma Trials and Research (EUSTAR) database? Study Design and Methods We applied the inclusion criteria of major recent SSc-ILD trials (Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Tocilizumab in Participants With Systemic Sclerosis [focuSSced], Scleroderma Lung Study II [SLS II], and Safety and Efficacy of Nintedanib in Systemic Sclerosis [SENSCIS]) and assessed progressive ILD, which was defined as absolute change in FVC and as significant progression (FVC decline ≥10%). Data were compared with all patients and with patients who did not fulfill any inclusion criteria. Results In total, 2,258 patients with SSc-ILD were included: 31.2% of the patients met SENSCIS criteria; 5.8% of the patients met SLS II criteria; 1.6% of the patients met focuSSced criteria, and 67.7% (1,529) of the patients did not meet any criteria. In the first 12 ± 3 months, the absolute FVC decline in all patients and in patients who fulfilled criteria from SENSCIS was –0.1%, in patients who fulfilled criteria from focuSSced was –3.7%, and in patients who fulfilled criteria from SLS II was 2.3%, with accompanying more progressors in focuSSced. The patient populations that fulfilled the different study inclusion criteria significantly differed in various clinical parameters. In the second 12-month period, SENSCIS-enriched patients had a further absolute FVC% decline as described for the total cohort. In contrast, patients who fulfilled the focuSSced and SLS II criteria showed numeric improvement of lung function. There were no significant associations of enrichment criteria and ILD progression. Interpretation The application of enrichment criteria from previous clinical trials showed enrichment for progression with variable success, which led to selected patient populations reducing feasibility of recruitment. These findings are important for future clinical trial design and interpretation of the results of published trials.Show less >
Language :
Anglais
Audience :
Internationale
Popular science :
Non
Administrative institution(s) :
Université de Lille
Inserm
CHU Lille
Inserm
CHU Lille
Submission date :
2024-01-12T00:22:51Z
2024-03-28T09:17:01Z
2024-03-28T09:17:01Z