Paradoxographical discourse on sources and ...
Document type :
Partie d'ouvrage
Title :
Paradoxographical discourse on sources and fontains
Author(s) :
Delattre, Charles [Auteur]
Histoire, Archéologie et Littérature des Mondes Anciens - UMR 8164 [HALMA]
Histoire, Archéologie et Littérature des Mondes Anciens - UMR 8164 [HALMA]
Scientific editor(s) :
Maria Gerolemou
Book title :
Recognizing Miracles in Antiquity and Beyond
Publisher :
de Gruyter
Publication place :
Berlin & New York
Publication date :
2018
English keyword(s) :
Paradoxography
HAL domain(s) :
Sciences de l'Homme et Société/Etudes classiques
Sciences de l'Homme et Société/Littératures
Sciences de l'Homme et Société/Littératures
English abstract : [en]
I will focus on paradoxographic descriptions in order to define these as a literary construct in which the persona of the author – the way he asserts himself as a provider of information – is at least as important as the ...
Show more >I will focus on paradoxographic descriptions in order to define these as a literary construct in which the persona of the author – the way he asserts himself as a provider of information – is at least as important as the extraordinary nature of what he describes. I will furthermore deny that “marvelous” (thaumaston) or “strange” (paradoxon) can be understood directly as a theme, topic or fact. In my view, the paradoxographic quality of the text will be the result of how the description is accomplished, not of what is described. Using the special case of sources and fountains, we will see how their peculiarities, as well as their implication in some rituals, create a topos that is both referential (it is precisely locatedin some part of the world) and rhetorical (it obeys certain features that cannot be explained by referentiality). The author of a paradoxographic text will be prominent in this analysis: he is the one who creates the conditions under which we are supposed to react, as we say, “this is indeed paradoxon.”Show less >
Show more >I will focus on paradoxographic descriptions in order to define these as a literary construct in which the persona of the author – the way he asserts himself as a provider of information – is at least as important as the extraordinary nature of what he describes. I will furthermore deny that “marvelous” (thaumaston) or “strange” (paradoxon) can be understood directly as a theme, topic or fact. In my view, the paradoxographic quality of the text will be the result of how the description is accomplished, not of what is described. Using the special case of sources and fountains, we will see how their peculiarities, as well as their implication in some rituals, create a topos that is both referential (it is precisely locatedin some part of the world) and rhetorical (it obeys certain features that cannot be explained by referentiality). The author of a paradoxographic text will be prominent in this analysis: he is the one who creates the conditions under which we are supposed to react, as we say, “this is indeed paradoxon.”Show less >
Language :
Anglais
Audience :
Internationale
Popular science :
Non
Source :