Statistical comparison of predictive models ...
Document type :
Article dans une revue scientifique: Article original
Permalink :
Title :
Statistical comparison of predictive models for quantitative analysis and classification in the framework of LIBS spectroscopy: A tutorial
Author(s) :
Duponchel, Ludovic [Auteur]
Laboratoire Avancé de Spectroscopie pour les Intéractions la Réactivité et l'Environnement (LASIRE) - UMR 8516
Fabre, Cécile [Auteur]
GeoRessources
Bousquet, Bruno [Auteur]
Institut de Chimie de la Matière Condensée de Bordeaux [ICMCB]
Motto-Ros, Vincent [Auteur]
iLM - Luminescence [iLM - LUMINESCENCE]
Laboratoire Avancé de Spectroscopie pour les Intéractions la Réactivité et l'Environnement (LASIRE) - UMR 8516
Fabre, Cécile [Auteur]
GeoRessources
Bousquet, Bruno [Auteur]
Institut de Chimie de la Matière Condensée de Bordeaux [ICMCB]
Motto-Ros, Vincent [Auteur]
iLM - Luminescence [iLM - LUMINESCENCE]
Journal title :
Spectrochimica Acta Part B: Atomic Spectroscopy
Volume number :
208
Publication date :
2023
English keyword(s) :
Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS)
Quantitative analysis
Classification
Model comparison
Statitiscal test
Significance
Chemometrics
Quantitative analysis
Classification
Model comparison
Statitiscal test
Significance
Chemometrics
HAL domain(s) :
Chimie/Matériaux
English abstract : [en]
Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy (LIBS) is a widely accepted technique used for both classification and quantification purposes considering complex and heterogeous samples. Based on a set of training spectra acquired ...
Show more >Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy (LIBS) is a widely accepted technique used for both classification and quantification purposes considering complex and heterogeous samples. Based on a set of training spectra acquired from diverse and representative samples within a specific application domain, it becomes possible to apply various data processing techniques and modeling methods to construct the predictive model in question. Naturally the complexity of both the laser-matter and the laser-plasma interactions and the heterogeneity of natural samples often requires the development of various predictive models, which are then compared based on figures of merit such as the RMSEP (Root Mean Square Error of Prediction) value for quantification or the classification rate for qualitative analysis. Our ultimate goal is, of course, to select the model that appears to be the most accurate, which ultimately boils down to searching for the lowest RMSEP value or the highest classification rate. This is precisely where the whole problem lies because even if we observe a different level of error for two models, for example, this difference is not necessarily statistically significant. In such a case, we are therefore not allowed to say that the lower error indicates the best predictive model to consider. The purpose of this article is to provide a tutorial on introducing a statistical model comparison procedure, whether they are quantitative or qualitative. Two LIBS data sets have been used to illustrate the principles of the proposed method.Show less >
Show more >Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy (LIBS) is a widely accepted technique used for both classification and quantification purposes considering complex and heterogeous samples. Based on a set of training spectra acquired from diverse and representative samples within a specific application domain, it becomes possible to apply various data processing techniques and modeling methods to construct the predictive model in question. Naturally the complexity of both the laser-matter and the laser-plasma interactions and the heterogeneity of natural samples often requires the development of various predictive models, which are then compared based on figures of merit such as the RMSEP (Root Mean Square Error of Prediction) value for quantification or the classification rate for qualitative analysis. Our ultimate goal is, of course, to select the model that appears to be the most accurate, which ultimately boils down to searching for the lowest RMSEP value or the highest classification rate. This is precisely where the whole problem lies because even if we observe a different level of error for two models, for example, this difference is not necessarily statistically significant. In such a case, we are therefore not allowed to say that the lower error indicates the best predictive model to consider. The purpose of this article is to provide a tutorial on introducing a statistical model comparison procedure, whether they are quantitative or qualitative. Two LIBS data sets have been used to illustrate the principles of the proposed method.Show less >
Language :
Anglais
Audience :
Non spécifiée
Popular science :
Non
Administrative institution(s) :
ENSCL
CNRS
Université de Lille
CNRS
Université de Lille
Collections :
Research team(s) :
Propriétés magnéto structurales des matériaux (PMSM)
Submission date :
2024-02-21T17:11:59Z
2024-02-27T10:18:54Z
2024-02-27T10:18:54Z
Files
- document
- Open access
- Access the document