• English
    • français
  • Help
  •  | 
  • Contact
  •  | 
  • About
  •  | 
  • Login
  • HAL portal
  •  | 
  • Pages Pro
  • EN
  •  / 
  • FR
View Item 
  •   LillOA Home
  • Liste des unités
  • METRICS : Evaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales - ULR 2694
  • View Item
  •   LillOA Home
  • Liste des unités
  • METRICS : Evaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales - ULR 2694
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Timeliness of vaccination in infants ...
  • BibTeX
  • CSV
  • Excel
  • RIS

Document type :
Article dans une revue scientifique: Article original
DOI :
10.1080/21645515.2017.1409318
PMID :
29182420
Permalink :
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12210/17296
Title :
Timeliness of vaccination in infants followed by primary-care pediatricians in france
Author(s) :
Bailly, Anne-Charlotte [Auteur]
Gras, Pauline [Auteur]
Lienhardt, Jean-François [Auteur]
Requillart, Jean-Christophe [Auteur]
Vie-Le-Sage, François [Auteur]
Martinot, Alain [Auteur] refId
Evaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales - ULR 2694 [METRICS]
Dubos, Francois [Auteur] refId
Evaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales - ULR 2694 [METRICS]
Journal title :
Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics
Abbreviated title :
Hum Vaccin Immunother
Pages :
0
Publication date :
2017-11-28
ISSN :
2164-554X
English keyword(s) :
immunization delay
children
pediatricians
timeliness
vaccine
HAL domain(s) :
Sciences du Vivant [q-bio]
English abstract : [en]
Vaccination status is more often evaluated by up-to-date vaccination coverage rather than timeliness of immunization. Delaying vaccination may be dangerous during infancy. The aim of this study was to identify the importance ...
Show more >
Vaccination status is more often evaluated by up-to-date vaccination coverage rather than timeliness of immunization. Delaying vaccination may be dangerous during infancy. The aim of this study was to identify the importance of potentially dangerous vaccination delay (previously defined) and determinants of these delays. We conducted a national, prospective, vaccination survey in June 2014, with primary care pediatricians. Children, 2 to 24 months of age, were included. Data about vaccination were extracted from their health books. Additional data were collected through a standardized questionnaire. Vaccine coverage rate and timeliness were calculated. Variables associated with a potentially dangerous vaccination delay as previously defined were determined by a multivariable analysis. Among the 443 included children (mean age 10.8 months, 49% males), 13% to 58% of vaccine doses according to vaccine type were done with a potentially dangerous delay. Globally, 47% of children had at least one potentially dangerous immunization delay. We identified two risk factors of potentially dangerous delayed immunization globally: an increasing age of the child (adjusted odds ratio: 1.2, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.1-1.3, p < 10-3Show less >
Language :
Anglais
Audience :
Internationale
Popular science :
Non
Administrative institution(s) :
CHU Lille
Université de Lille
Collections :
  • METRICS : Evaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales - ULR 2694
Submission date :
2019-12-09T18:18:07Z
Université de Lille

Mentions légales
Université de Lille © 2017