The Post-Disciplinary Prison
Type de document :
Partie d'ouvrage: Chapitre
URL permanente :
Titre :
The Post-Disciplinary Prison
Auteur(s) :
Chantraine, Gilles [Auteur]
Centre Lillois d’Études et de Recherches Sociologiques et Économiques - UMR 8019 [CLERSÉ]
Centre Lillois d’Études et de Recherches Sociologiques et Économiques - UMR 8019 [CLERSÉ]
Titre de l’ouvrage :
Discipline, Security and Beyond. Rethinking Michel Foucault 1978 & 1979 Collège de France Lectures
Pagination :
55-76
Éditeur :
Carceral Notebooks
Date de publication :
2009
Mot(s)-clé(s) en anglais :
prison - discipline - governmentally - Canada
Discipline(s) HAL :
Sciences de l'Homme et Société/Sociologie
Résumé en anglais : [en]
Those who have studied penal systems have tried very hard to describe and interpret the historically heavy inertia of carceral institutions. The goal was to show how the carceral reforms remained trapped, to borrow a phrase ...
Lire la suite >Those who have studied penal systems have tried very hard to describe and interpret the historically heavy inertia of carceral institutions. The goal was to show how the carceral reforms remained trapped, to borrow a phrase from A. Pires, « in a flytrap » of a modern penal rationality, defined as a closed system of thought, the basis of which was created at the end of the 18th century, and had the capacity to naturalize the normative structure of penal laws and their institutional applications1. The emergence of this sys- tem of thought has allowed for the continuation, following M. Foucault, of the decoding of the regime of modern penality and the untangling at a pro- found level of analysis, the paradox of how the carceral reforms contributed to the perpetuation of the system. This occurred because the reforms were implicitly or explicitly based on the rationality and its assumptions.Lire moins >
Lire la suite >Those who have studied penal systems have tried very hard to describe and interpret the historically heavy inertia of carceral institutions. The goal was to show how the carceral reforms remained trapped, to borrow a phrase from A. Pires, « in a flytrap » of a modern penal rationality, defined as a closed system of thought, the basis of which was created at the end of the 18th century, and had the capacity to naturalize the normative structure of penal laws and their institutional applications1. The emergence of this sys- tem of thought has allowed for the continuation, following M. Foucault, of the decoding of the regime of modern penality and the untangling at a pro- found level of analysis, the paradox of how the carceral reforms contributed to the perpetuation of the system. This occurred because the reforms were implicitly or explicitly based on the rationality and its assumptions.Lire moins >
Langue :
Anglais
Audience :
Non spécifiée
Établissement(s) :
Université de Lille
CNRS
Univ. Littoral Côte d’Opale
CNRS
Univ. Littoral Côte d’Opale
Collections :
Date de dépôt :
2020-01-23T10:25:11Z
2020-01-29T09:02:06Z
2021-05-14T07:46:24Z
2020-01-29T09:02:06Z
2021-05-14T07:46:24Z
Fichiers
- post-disciplinary.prison.pdf
- Version finale acceptée pour publication (postprint)
- Accès restreint
- Accéder au document