Misreading of consumer dissatisfaction in ...
Type de document :
Article dans une revue scientifique
Titre :
Misreading of consumer dissatisfaction in online product reviews: Writing style as a cause for bias
Auteur(s) :
Antioco, Michael [Auteur]
emlyon business school [EM]
Coussement, Kristof [Auteur]
Lille économie management - UMR 9221 [LEM]
emlyon business school [EM]
Coussement, Kristof [Auteur]
Lille économie management - UMR 9221 [LEM]
Titre de la revue :
International Journal of Information Management
Pagination :
301-310
Éditeur :
Elsevier
Date de publication :
2018-02
ISSN :
0143-6236
Mot(s)-clé(s) en anglais :
Online consumer review
Post-launch product feedback
Information management
Language-style analysis
Judgment bias
Post-launch product feedback
Information management
Language-style analysis
Judgment bias
Discipline(s) HAL :
Sciences de l'Homme et Société
Sciences de l'Homme et Société/Gestion et management
Sciences de l'Homme et Société/Gestion et management
Résumé en anglais : [en]
This study improves our understanding of managers’ misreading of negative online reviews. Our findings are derived from a sample of 1014 written online reviews and 507 experienced marketing managers. By building on the ...
Lire la suite >This study improves our understanding of managers’ misreading of negative online reviews. Our findings are derived from a sample of 1014 written online reviews and 507 experienced marketing managers. By building on the judgment-bias literature and psychometric language-style analysis, we find several key results that can ultimately contribute to more effective information management for marketing decisions. Managers tend to better interpret negative reviews when consumers use more cognitive language markers in the form of insight and discrepancy words and more third-person pronouns (i.e., undefined social referents) in their reviews. The inverse relationship exists for the use of causality words and future tenses (i.e., behavioral intentions), as managers tend to underestimate the gravity of the situation under these conditions. Expressions of positive and negative emotions in reviews do not significantly affect managers’ readings of negative reviews. Furthermore, more experienced managers and female managers are better at identifying negative reviews, and longer consumer reviews make it more difficult for managers to correctly identify negative reviews.Lire moins >
Lire la suite >This study improves our understanding of managers’ misreading of negative online reviews. Our findings are derived from a sample of 1014 written online reviews and 507 experienced marketing managers. By building on the judgment-bias literature and psychometric language-style analysis, we find several key results that can ultimately contribute to more effective information management for marketing decisions. Managers tend to better interpret negative reviews when consumers use more cognitive language markers in the form of insight and discrepancy words and more third-person pronouns (i.e., undefined social referents) in their reviews. The inverse relationship exists for the use of causality words and future tenses (i.e., behavioral intentions), as managers tend to underestimate the gravity of the situation under these conditions. Expressions of positive and negative emotions in reviews do not significantly affect managers’ readings of negative reviews. Furthermore, more experienced managers and female managers are better at identifying negative reviews, and longer consumer reviews make it more difficult for managers to correctly identify negative reviews.Lire moins >
Langue :
Anglais
Comité de lecture :
Oui
Audience :
Internationale
Vulgarisation :
Non
Collections :
Source :