Titre :

Comparison of mitral valve replacement and repair for degenerative mitral regurgitation: a meta-analysis and implications for transcatheter mitral procedures

Auteur(s) :

Overtchouk, Pavel [Auteur]
Ben-Ali, W. [Auteur]
Prendergast, Bernard D. [Auteur]
Conradi, L. [Auteur]
Hahn, R. [Auteur]
Granada, J. [Auteur]
Modine, T. [Auteur]

Titre de la revue :

Current cardiology reports

Nom court de la revue :

Curr Cardiol Rep

Numéro :

22

Pagination :

79

Date de publication :

2020-07-09

ISSN :

1534-3170

Mot(s)-clé(s) :

Surgical mitral repair
Mitral regurgitation
Surgical mitral replacement
Transcatheter therapies

Discipline(s) HAL :

Sciences du Vivant [q-bio]

Résumé en anglais : [en]

Surgical mitral valve repair is considered superior to replacement to treat primary mitral regurgitation. However, the heterogeneity of cohorts and the lack of consideration of confounding in the published literature raise ...
Lire la suite >Surgical mitral valve repair is considered superior to replacement to treat primary mitral regurgitation. However, the heterogeneity of cohorts and the lack of consideration of confounding in the published literature raise potential biases. The aim of this study was to pool all available matched data comparing outcomes of mitral valve repair and replacement in the setting of primary mitral regurgitation. We searched Medline, Embase and the Cochrane Library Central Register of Controlled Trials to identify propensity-matched studies or reports with multivariable adjustment comparing repair and replacement in patients with primary mitral regurgitation. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. DerSimonian and Laird random effects were used to perform the meta-analysis. Eight observational studies were selected including 4599 patients (3064 mitral repairs and 1535 replacements). Mean age ranged from 62 to 69 years, and the mean follow-up duration ranged between 3 and 9 years. Replacement was associated with an increased risk of long-term all-cause mortality compared to repair (HR of 1.68, 95% confidence interval 1.35-2.09, p < 0.001, τ22Lire moins >

Langue :

Anglais

Audience :

Internationale

Vulgarisation :

Non

Établissement(s) :

CHU Lille
Inserm
Université de Lille

Collections :

• Lille Neurosciences & Cognition (LilNCog) - U 1172

Équipe(s) de recherche :

Troubles cognitifs dégénératifs et vasculaires

Date de dépôt :

2021-06-23T13:47:22Z