Active Versus Passive Recovery in ...
Type de document :
Article dans une revue scientifique: Article original
PMID :
URL permanente :
Titre :
Active Versus Passive Recovery in High-Intensity Intermittent Exercises in Children: An Exploratory Study.
Auteur(s) :
Baquet, Georges [Auteur]
Unité de Recherche Pluridisciplinaire Sport, Santé, Société (URePSSS) - ULR 7369
Dupont, Gregory [Auteur]
Unité de Recherche Pluridisciplinaire Sport, Santé, Société (URePSSS) - EA 7369
Gamelin, François-Xavier [Auteur]
Unité de Recherche Pluridisciplinaire Sport, Santé, Société (URePSSS) - ULR 7369 - ULR 4488 [URePSSS]
Aucouturier, Julien [Auteur]
Berthoin, Serge [Auteur]
Unité de Recherche Pluridisciplinaire Sport, Santé, Société (URePSSS) - ULR 7369
Unité de Recherche Pluridisciplinaire Sport, Santé, Société (URePSSS) - ULR 7369
Dupont, Gregory [Auteur]
Unité de Recherche Pluridisciplinaire Sport, Santé, Société (URePSSS) - EA 7369
Gamelin, François-Xavier [Auteur]
Unité de Recherche Pluridisciplinaire Sport, Santé, Société (URePSSS) - ULR 7369 - ULR 4488 [URePSSS]
Aucouturier, Julien [Auteur]
Berthoin, Serge [Auteur]
Unité de Recherche Pluridisciplinaire Sport, Santé, Société (URePSSS) - ULR 7369
Titre de la revue :
Pediatric Exercise Science
Nom court de la revue :
Pediatr Exerc Sci
Numéro :
31
Pagination :
248-253
Date de publication :
2019-05-01
ISSN :
1543-2920
Mot(s)-clé(s) en anglais :
Cardiorespiratory Fitness
Child
Female
High-Intensity Interval Training
Humans
Male
Muscle Fatigue
Oxygen Consumption
Physical Endurance
aerobic fitness
field tests
interval training
maximal oxygen uptake
Child
Female
High-Intensity Interval Training
Humans
Male
Muscle Fatigue
Oxygen Consumption
Physical Endurance
aerobic fitness
field tests
interval training
maximal oxygen uptake
Résumé en anglais : [en]
This study aimed to compare the effect of active recovery (AR) versus passive recovery (PR) on time to exhaustion and time spent at high percentages of peak oxygen uptake ( ) during short, high-intensity intermittent ...
Lire la suite >This study aimed to compare the effect of active recovery (AR) versus passive recovery (PR) on time to exhaustion and time spent at high percentages of peak oxygen uptake ( ) during short, high-intensity intermittent exercises in children. Twelve children (9.5 [0.7] y) underwent a graded test and 2 short, high-intensity intermittent exercises (15 s at 120% of maximal aerobic speed) interspersed with either 15 seconds of AR (50% of maximal aerobic speed) or 15-second PR until exhaustion. A very large effect (effect size = 2.42; 95% confidence interval, 1.32 to 3.52) was observed for time to exhaustion in favor of longer time to exhaustion with PR compared with AR. Trivial or small effect sizes were found for , peakHR, and peak ventilation between PR and AR, while a moderate effect in favor of higher average values (effect size = -0.87; 95% confidence interval, -1.76 to -0.01) was found using AR. The difference between PR and AR for the time spent above 80% (t80%) and 90% (t90%) of was trivial. Despite the shorter running duration in AR, similar t80% and t90% were spent with AR and PR. Time spent at a high percentage of may be attained by running 3-fold shorter using AR compared with using PR.Lire moins >
Lire la suite >This study aimed to compare the effect of active recovery (AR) versus passive recovery (PR) on time to exhaustion and time spent at high percentages of peak oxygen uptake ( ) during short, high-intensity intermittent exercises in children. Twelve children (9.5 [0.7] y) underwent a graded test and 2 short, high-intensity intermittent exercises (15 s at 120% of maximal aerobic speed) interspersed with either 15 seconds of AR (50% of maximal aerobic speed) or 15-second PR until exhaustion. A very large effect (effect size = 2.42; 95% confidence interval, 1.32 to 3.52) was observed for time to exhaustion in favor of longer time to exhaustion with PR compared with AR. Trivial or small effect sizes were found for , peakHR, and peak ventilation between PR and AR, while a moderate effect in favor of higher average values (effect size = -0.87; 95% confidence interval, -1.76 to -0.01) was found using AR. The difference between PR and AR for the time spent above 80% (t80%) and 90% (t90%) of was trivial. Despite the shorter running duration in AR, similar t80% and t90% were spent with AR and PR. Time spent at a high percentage of may be attained by running 3-fold shorter using AR compared with using PR.Lire moins >
Comité de lecture :
Oui
Audience :
Non spécifiée
Établissement(s) :
Université de Lille
Univ. Artois
Univ. Littoral Côte d’Opale
Univ. Artois
Univ. Littoral Côte d’Opale
Date de dépôt :
2021-11-02T12:27:42Z
Fichiers
- Baquet-PES.2018-0218_R3.pdf
- Version finale acceptée pour publication (postprint)
- Accès libre
- Accéder au document