• English
    • français
  • Aide
  •  | 
  • Contact
  •  | 
  • À Propos
  •  | 
  • Ouvrir une session
  • Portail HAL
  •  | 
  • Pages Pro Chercheurs
  • EN
  •  / 
  • FR
Voir le document 
  •   Accueil de LillOA
  • Liste des unités
  • Lille Économie Management (LEM) - UMR 9221
  • Voir le document
  •   Accueil de LillOA
  • Liste des unités
  • Lille Économie Management (LEM) - UMR 9221
  • Voir le document
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

When there is No ZOPA: Mental Fatigue, ...
  • BibTeX
  • CSV
  • Excel
  • RIS

Type de document :
Article dans une revue scientifique
DOI :
10.1111/ncmr.12178
Titre :
When there is No ZOPA: Mental Fatigue, Integrative Complexity, and Creative Agreement in Negotiations
Auteur(s) :
Yao, Jingjing [Auteur]
Lille économie management - UMR 9221 [LEM]
Zhang, Zhi‐xue [Auteur]
Liu, Leigh Anne [Auteur]
Titre de la revue :
Negotiation and Conflict Management Research
Éditeur :
Wiley
Date de publication :
2020-05-31
ISSN :
1750-4708
Discipline(s) HAL :
Sciences de l'Homme et Société
Sciences de l'Homme et Société/Gestion et management
Résumé en anglais : [en]
How to reach a creative agreement in negotiations when the Zone of Possible Agreement (ZOPA) does not apparently exist? To answer this question, we drew on the cognitive flexibility theory and proposed a model predicting ...
Lire la suite >
How to reach a creative agreement in negotiations when the Zone of Possible Agreement (ZOPA) does not apparently exist? To answer this question, we drew on the cognitive flexibility theory and proposed a model predicting that negotiators’ mental fatigue would engender fewer creative agreements, and their integrative complexity acted as an underlying mechanism. Across four studies, we measured (Study 1) and manipulated (Studies 2–4) mental fatigue to test our hypotheses. We found that negotiation dyads with higher mental fatigue were less likely to display integrative complexity and hence less likely to reach creative agreements in negotiations without an apparent ZOPA. We also demonstrated that in this kind of negotiation, simply identifying additional issues or proposing packaging offers were not enough; negotiators need to do both to construct creative agreements. This research contributes to the literature of negotiation, creative problem‐solving, and the cognitive flexibility theory.Lire moins >
Langue :
Anglais
Comité de lecture :
Oui
Audience :
Internationale
Vulgarisation :
Non
Collections :
  • Lille Économie Management (LEM) - UMR 9221
Source :
Harvested from HAL
Fichiers
Thumbnail
  • ncmr.12178
  • Accès libre
  • Accéder au document
Université de Lille

Mentions légales
Université de Lille © 2017