Particle placement and the case for ...
Type de document :
Compte-rendu et recension critique d'ouvrage
Titre :
Particle placement and the case for 'allostructions'
Auteur(s) :
Titre de la revue :
Constructions
Date de publication :
2006
ISSN :
1860-2010
Mot(s)-clé(s) en anglais :
Verb-particle construction
syntactic alternation
English
Construction Grammar
syntactic alternation
English
Construction Grammar
Discipline(s) HAL :
Sciences de l'Homme et Société/Linguistique
Résumé en anglais : [en]
As a reaction against derivational frameworks, Construction Grammar accords no place to regular alternations between two surface patterns. This paper argues for a more tolerant position towards alternations. With respect ...
Lire la suite >As a reaction against derivational frameworks, Construction Grammar accords no place to regular alternations between two surface patterns. This paper argues for a more tolerant position towards alternations. With respect to the well-known placement variability of verbal particles (pick up the book / pick the book up), the author grants that there is little reason for analysing one ordering as underlying the other but goes on to show that it is equally problematic to claim that the two orderings code two different meanings (or serve two different functions) and therefore cannot be linked in the grammar as variants of a single category. The alternative offered here is to consider the two orderings as two “allostructions” of a more general transitive verb-particle construction underspecified for word order.Lire moins >
Lire la suite >As a reaction against derivational frameworks, Construction Grammar accords no place to regular alternations between two surface patterns. This paper argues for a more tolerant position towards alternations. With respect to the well-known placement variability of verbal particles (pick up the book / pick the book up), the author grants that there is little reason for analysing one ordering as underlying the other but goes on to show that it is equally problematic to claim that the two orderings code two different meanings (or serve two different functions) and therefore cannot be linked in the grammar as variants of a single category. The alternative offered here is to consider the two orderings as two “allostructions” of a more general transitive verb-particle construction underspecified for word order.Lire moins >
Langue :
Anglais
Vulgarisation :
Non
Commentaire :
Special volume edited by Doris Schönefeld
Collections :
Source :
Fichiers
- document
- Accès libre
- Accéder au document
- Particle%20placement%20and%20the%20case%20for%20allostructions.pdf
- Accès libre
- Accéder au document