A contrastive analysis of five automated ...
Document type :
Partie d'ouvrage
Title :
A contrastive analysis of five automated QA tools (QA Distiller 6.5.8, Xbench 2.8, ErrorSpy 5.0, SDLTrados 2007 QA Checker 2.0 and SDLX 2007 SP2 QA Check)
Author(s) :
Debove,, Antonia [Auteur]
Chercheur indépendant
Furlan,, Sabrina [Auteur]
Chercheur indépendant
Depraetere, Ilse [Auteur]
Savoirs, Textes, Langage (STL) - UMR 8163 [STL]
Chercheur indépendant
Furlan,, Sabrina [Auteur]
Chercheur indépendant
Depraetere, Ilse [Auteur]

Savoirs, Textes, Langage (STL) - UMR 8163 [STL]
Scientific editor(s) :
Mouton de Gruyter
Book title :
Perspectives on translation quality
Publisher :
Mouton de Gruyter
Publication date :
2012
English keyword(s) :
QA tools
quality assurance
quality assurance
HAL domain(s) :
Sciences de l'Homme et Société/Linguistique
English abstract : [en]
This chapter offers a comparison of five formal quality evaluation tools and shows in what ways such tools can be integrated into the translation workflow. The functional features of the tools are compared, their ...
Show more >This chapter offers a comparison of five formal quality evaluation tools and shows in what ways such tools can be integrated into the translation workflow. The functional features of the tools are compared, their user-friendliness, their efficiency and their cost. Examples are given that illustrate in what ways the choice of QA tool for a specific translation project is determined by the project settings.Show less >
Show more >This chapter offers a comparison of five formal quality evaluation tools and shows in what ways such tools can be integrated into the translation workflow. The functional features of the tools are compared, their user-friendliness, their efficiency and their cost. Examples are given that illustrate in what ways the choice of QA tool for a specific translation project is determined by the project settings.Show less >
Language :
Français
Audience :
Non spécifiée
Popular science :
Non
Collections :
Source :