What is the best strategy for retaining ...
Type de document :
Article dans une revue scientifique: Article original
URL permanente :
Titre :
What is the best strategy for retaining gestures in working memory?
Auteur(s) :
Gimenes, Guillaume [Auteur]
Psychologie des âges de la vie et adaptation [PAVeA]
Pennequin, Valérie [Auteur]
Psychologie des âges de la vie et adaptation [PAVeA]
Mercer, Tom [Auteur]
University of Wolverhampton
Psychologie des âges de la vie et adaptation [PAVeA]
Pennequin, Valérie [Auteur]
Psychologie des âges de la vie et adaptation [PAVeA]
Mercer, Tom [Auteur]
University of Wolverhampton
Titre de la revue :
Memory
Nom court de la revue :
Memory
Numéro :
24
Pagination :
p.757-765
Éditeur :
Informa UK Limited
Date de publication :
2015-08-14
Mot(s)-clé(s) en anglais :
Working memory
Gestures
Strategy
Gestures
Strategy
Discipline(s) HAL :
Sciences cognitives/Psychologie
Résumé en anglais : [en]
This study aimed to determine whether the recall of gestures in working memory could be enhanced by verbal or gestural strategies. We also attempted to examine whether these strategies could help resist verbal or gestural ...
Lire la suite >This study aimed to determine whether the recall of gestures in working memory could be enhanced by verbal or gestural strategies. We also attempted to examine whether these strategies could help resist verbal or gestural interference. Fifty-four participants were divided into three groups according to the content of the training session. This included a control group, a verbal strategy group (where gestures were associated with labels) and a gestural strategy group (where participants repeated gestures and were told to imagine reproducing the movements). During the experiment, the participants had to reproduce a series of gestures under three conditions: “no interference”, gestural interference (gestural suppression) and verbal interference (articulatory suppression). The results showed that task performance was enhanced in the verbal strategy group, but there was no significant difference between the gestural strategy and control groups. Moreover, compared to the “no interference” condition, performance decreased in the presence of gestural interference, except within the verbal strategy group. Finally, verbal interference hindered performance in all groups. The discussion focuses on the use of labels to recall gestures and differentiates the induced strategies from self-initiated strategies.Lire moins >
Lire la suite >This study aimed to determine whether the recall of gestures in working memory could be enhanced by verbal or gestural strategies. We also attempted to examine whether these strategies could help resist verbal or gestural interference. Fifty-four participants were divided into three groups according to the content of the training session. This included a control group, a verbal strategy group (where gestures were associated with labels) and a gestural strategy group (where participants repeated gestures and were told to imagine reproducing the movements). During the experiment, the participants had to reproduce a series of gestures under three conditions: “no interference”, gestural interference (gestural suppression) and verbal interference (articulatory suppression). The results showed that task performance was enhanced in the verbal strategy group, but there was no significant difference between the gestural strategy and control groups. Moreover, compared to the “no interference” condition, performance decreased in the presence of gestural interference, except within the verbal strategy group. Finally, verbal interference hindered performance in all groups. The discussion focuses on the use of labels to recall gestures and differentiates the induced strategies from self-initiated strategies.Lire moins >
Langue :
Anglais
Comité de lecture :
Oui
Audience :
Internationale
Établissement(s) :
Université de Lille
Collections :
Date de dépôt :
2022-05-16T16:27:15Z
2022-05-24T12:39:06Z
2022-05-24T12:39:06Z