The Production of Value Opinions by ...
Document type :
Compte-rendu et recension critique d'ouvrage
DOI :
Title :
The Production of Value Opinions by Specialized Valuers: Practical Sense and the Enactment of Judgment†
Author(s) :
Plante, Maude [Auteur]
Maire, Sarah [Auteur]
Lille économie management - UMR 9221 [LEM]
Pucci, Richard [Auteur]
Monash university
Maire, Sarah [Auteur]
Lille économie management - UMR 9221 [LEM]
Pucci, Richard [Auteur]
Monash university
Journal title :
Contemporary Accounting Research
Publisher :
Canadian Academic Accounting Association
Publication date :
2022-02-02
ISSN :
0823-9150
HAL domain(s) :
Sciences de l'Homme et Société/Gestion et management
English abstract : [en]
This article explores how valuers construct value opinions. Although some implications of outsourcing valuation to valuers for accounting purposes have been highlighted in the literature, we add a valuer perspective ...
Show more >This article explores how valuers construct value opinions. Although some implications of outsourcing valuation to valuers for accounting purposes have been highlighted in the literature, we add a valuer perspective complementing the accountant's standpoint in order to obtain a fuller picture of these ramifications. Drawing on 62 interviews, we study the role of judgment in valuation and find that judgment is largely tied with the sensemaking of valuers. By examining the valuation activities of art and real estate valuers, we show that these specialized valuers follow a similar valuation process which allows them to grasp how to go on with valuation. This four-phase process starts and ends by situating the opinion in its specific valuation context and is centered on iterations between researching, analyzing, and relativizing comparable data that may be adjusted to connect with a sense of what the value should be. Overall, judgment is shown to be enacted based on a practical sense of conducting valuation that includes a “gut feeling” of what represents a plausible value. This study suggests that the valuer's input should be recognized as situated, sense-contingent, and vulnerable to the underlying politics and risks tied to providing an opinion. Our results also point to stark differences between how valuers approach the use of judgment compared to how judgment is typically exercised by accounting specialists.Show less >
Show more >This article explores how valuers construct value opinions. Although some implications of outsourcing valuation to valuers for accounting purposes have been highlighted in the literature, we add a valuer perspective complementing the accountant's standpoint in order to obtain a fuller picture of these ramifications. Drawing on 62 interviews, we study the role of judgment in valuation and find that judgment is largely tied with the sensemaking of valuers. By examining the valuation activities of art and real estate valuers, we show that these specialized valuers follow a similar valuation process which allows them to grasp how to go on with valuation. This four-phase process starts and ends by situating the opinion in its specific valuation context and is centered on iterations between researching, analyzing, and relativizing comparable data that may be adjusted to connect with a sense of what the value should be. Overall, judgment is shown to be enacted based on a practical sense of conducting valuation that includes a “gut feeling” of what represents a plausible value. This study suggests that the valuer's input should be recognized as situated, sense-contingent, and vulnerable to the underlying politics and risks tied to providing an opinion. Our results also point to stark differences between how valuers approach the use of judgment compared to how judgment is typically exercised by accounting specialists.Show less >
Language :
Anglais
Popular science :
Non
Collections :
Source :