Interspecific shared collective decision-making ...
Document type :
Article dans une revue scientifique: Article original
DOI :
PMID :
Title :
Interspecific shared collective decision-making in two forensically important species
Author(s) :
Boulay, Julien [Auteur]
Deneubourg, Jean-Louis [Auteur]
Hedouin, Valery [Auteur]
Unité de Taphonomie médico-légale et Anatomie - ULR 7367 [UTML&A]
Charabidze, Damien [Auteur]
Unité de Taphonomie médico-légale et Anatomie - ULR 7367 [UTML&A]
Deneubourg, Jean-Louis [Auteur]
Hedouin, Valery [Auteur]

Unité de Taphonomie médico-légale et Anatomie - ULR 7367 [UTML&A]
Charabidze, Damien [Auteur]

Unité de Taphonomie médico-légale et Anatomie - ULR 7367 [UTML&A]
Journal title :
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
Publisher :
Royal Society, The
Publication date :
2016-02-10
ISSN :
0962-8452
English keyword(s) :
mixed-species group
gregariousness
marking
binary choice
tracking
amplification
gregariousness
marking
binary choice
tracking
amplification
HAL domain(s) :
Sciences du Vivant [q-bio]
English abstract : [en]
To date, the study of collective behaviour has mainly focused on intraspecific situations: the collective decision-making of mixed-species groups involving interspecific aggregation-segregation has received little attention. ...
Show more >To date, the study of collective behaviour has mainly focused on intraspecific situations: the collective decision-making of mixed-species groups involving interspecific aggregation-segregation has received little attention. Here, we show that, in both conspecific and heterospecific groups, the larvae of two species (Lucilia sericata and Calliphora vomitoria, calliphorid carrion-feeding flies) were able to make a collective choice. In all groups, the choice was made within a few minutes and persisted throughout the period of the experiment. The monitoring of a focal individual within a group showed that these aggregations were governed by attractive and retentive effects of the group. Furthermore, the similarity observed between the conspecific and heterospecific groups suggested the existence of shared aggregation signals. The group size was found to have a stronger influence than the species of necrophagous larvae. These results should be viewed in relation to the well-known correlation between group size and heat generation. This study provides the first experimental examination of the dynamics of collective decision-making in mixed-species groups of invertebrates, contributing to our understanding of the cooperation-competition phenomenon in animal social groups.Show less >
Show more >To date, the study of collective behaviour has mainly focused on intraspecific situations: the collective decision-making of mixed-species groups involving interspecific aggregation-segregation has received little attention. Here, we show that, in both conspecific and heterospecific groups, the larvae of two species (Lucilia sericata and Calliphora vomitoria, calliphorid carrion-feeding flies) were able to make a collective choice. In all groups, the choice was made within a few minutes and persisted throughout the period of the experiment. The monitoring of a focal individual within a group showed that these aggregations were governed by attractive and retentive effects of the group. Furthermore, the similarity observed between the conspecific and heterospecific groups suggested the existence of shared aggregation signals. The group size was found to have a stronger influence than the species of necrophagous larvae. These results should be viewed in relation to the well-known correlation between group size and heat generation. This study provides the first experimental examination of the dynamics of collective decision-making in mixed-species groups of invertebrates, contributing to our understanding of the cooperation-competition phenomenon in animal social groups.Show less >
Language :
Anglais
Peer reviewed article :
Oui
Audience :
Internationale
Popular science :
Non
Source :