Does the choice of a modern formal logic ...
Type de document :
Autre communication scientifique (congrès sans actes - poster - séminaire...): Communication dans un congrès avec actes
Titre :
Does the choice of a modern formal logic influence the interpretation of Aristotle’s syllogistic? A study of Kurt Ebbinghaus’ answer
Auteur(s) :
McConaughey, Zoé [Auteur]
Université de Lille - Faculté des Humanités [UL Humanités]
Savoirs, Textes, Langage (STL) - UMR 8163 [STL]
Université de Lille - Faculté des Humanités [UL Humanités]
Savoirs, Textes, Langage (STL) - UMR 8163 [STL]
Titre de la manifestation scientifique :
Aristotle’s Organon in old and new logic, c. 1800–1950
Organisateur(s) de la manifestation scientifique :
Gerald Hartung
Colin Guthrie King
Venanzio Raspa
Colin Guthrie King
Venanzio Raspa
Ville :
Villa Vigoni, Menaggio (Como)
Pays :
Italie
Date de début de la manifestation scientifique :
2022-03-10
Discipline(s) HAL :
Sciences de l'Homme et Société/Philosophie
Mathématiques [math]/Logique [math.LO]
Mathématiques [math]/Logique [math.LO]
Résumé en anglais : [en]
In 1964, Ebbinghaus published Ein formales Modell der Syllogistik des Aristoteles in which he provides a formalization of Aristotle’s assertoric syllogistic using the Operationist logic of Lorenzen (1955). My main focus ...
Lire la suite >In 1964, Ebbinghaus published Ein formales Modell der Syllogistik des Aristoteles in which he provides a formalization of Aristotle’s assertoric syllogistic using the Operationist logic of Lorenzen (1955). My main focus will be on the methodological considerations Ebbinghaus develops throughout his study: he was very self-conscious of his role as interpreter of Aristotle’s logic and was well aware of the fact that, when developing a formal reconstruction of Aristotle’s syllogistic, the choice of logical framework, such as the Operationist logic, was taking a stance in the contemporary debate on the foundations of logic, de facto arguing in favor of the chosen framework. In this regard, Ebbinghaus considered his formal reconstruction as a way of better understanding Aristotle’s logic and as defending Lorenzen’s Operationist logic. By focusing on Ebbinghaus’ study, I wish to question how much modern formal logics influence the interpretation of an ancient logic, and, in this case, of Aristotle’s assertoric syllogistic.ReferencesEbbinghaus, Kurt (1964). Ein formales Modell der Syllogistik des Aristoteles. Vol. 9. Hypomnemata, Untersuchungen zur Antike und zu ihrem Nachleben. Göttingen, Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Lorenzen, Paul (1955). Einführung in die operative Logik und Mathematik. Berlin: Springer.Lire moins >
Lire la suite >In 1964, Ebbinghaus published Ein formales Modell der Syllogistik des Aristoteles in which he provides a formalization of Aristotle’s assertoric syllogistic using the Operationist logic of Lorenzen (1955). My main focus will be on the methodological considerations Ebbinghaus develops throughout his study: he was very self-conscious of his role as interpreter of Aristotle’s logic and was well aware of the fact that, when developing a formal reconstruction of Aristotle’s syllogistic, the choice of logical framework, such as the Operationist logic, was taking a stance in the contemporary debate on the foundations of logic, de facto arguing in favor of the chosen framework. In this regard, Ebbinghaus considered his formal reconstruction as a way of better understanding Aristotle’s logic and as defending Lorenzen’s Operationist logic. By focusing on Ebbinghaus’ study, I wish to question how much modern formal logics influence the interpretation of an ancient logic, and, in this case, of Aristotle’s assertoric syllogistic.ReferencesEbbinghaus, Kurt (1964). Ein formales Modell der Syllogistik des Aristoteles. Vol. 9. Hypomnemata, Untersuchungen zur Antike und zu ihrem Nachleben. Göttingen, Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Lorenzen, Paul (1955). Einführung in die operative Logik und Mathematik. Berlin: Springer.Lire moins >
Langue :
Anglais
Comité de lecture :
Oui
Audience :
Internationale
Vulgarisation :
Non
Collections :
Source :