In-depth analysis of Kubernetes manifest ...
Document type :
Communication dans un congrès avec actes
Title :
In-depth analysis of Kubernetes manifest verification tools for robust CNF deployment
Author(s) :
Diarra, Boubacar [Auteur]
Orange Innovation
Guillouard, Karine [Auteur]
Orange Innovation
Ouzzif, Meryem [Auteur]
Orange Innovation
Merle, Philippe [Auteur]
Self-adaptation for distributed services and large software systems [SPIRALS]
Stefani, Jean-Bernard [Auteur]
Sound Programming of Adaptive Dependable Embedded Systems [SPADES]
Orange Innovation
Guillouard, Karine [Auteur]
Orange Innovation
Ouzzif, Meryem [Auteur]
Orange Innovation
Merle, Philippe [Auteur]
Self-adaptation for distributed services and large software systems [SPIRALS]
Stefani, Jean-Bernard [Auteur]
Sound Programming of Adaptive Dependable Embedded Systems [SPADES]
Conference title :
ICIN 2024 - Conference on Innovation in Clouds, Internet and Networks
Conference organizers(s) :
DNAC
City :
Paris
Country :
France
Start date of the conference :
2024-03-11
Publication date :
2024
English keyword(s) :
Kubernetes
manifests verification
verification tools
evaluation criteria
CNF
robust CNF deployment
manifests verification
verification tools
evaluation criteria
CNF
robust CNF deployment
HAL domain(s) :
Informatique [cs]
English abstract : [en]
Kubernetes has emerged as the leading platform for orchestrating cloud-native network functions (CNF). The description of the hardware and software architecture of systems to be deployed with Kubernetes is defined in ...
Show more >Kubernetes has emerged as the leading platform for orchestrating cloud-native network functions (CNF). The description of the hardware and software architecture of systems to be deployed with Kubernetes is defined in configuration files called manifests. In order to address the errors that these manifests may contain, manifest verification tools have been developed. However, evaluating and selecting the most appropriate verification tool for a given project is a difficult task. To facilitate this evaluation process, we identified and characterized the most relevant verification capabilities, useful also in the CNF context. The selected capabilities serve as criteria for the evaluation of manifest verification tools. In total, we have identified 13 criteria, like the variety of verification types or the ability to carry out JSON Schema-based verification. The identified criteria were used to evaluate 16 of the most commonly used verification tools in the Kubernetes community. This evaluation revealed several shortcomings in the existing tools.Show less >
Show more >Kubernetes has emerged as the leading platform for orchestrating cloud-native network functions (CNF). The description of the hardware and software architecture of systems to be deployed with Kubernetes is defined in configuration files called manifests. In order to address the errors that these manifests may contain, manifest verification tools have been developed. However, evaluating and selecting the most appropriate verification tool for a given project is a difficult task. To facilitate this evaluation process, we identified and characterized the most relevant verification capabilities, useful also in the CNF context. The selected capabilities serve as criteria for the evaluation of manifest verification tools. In total, we have identified 13 criteria, like the variety of verification types or the ability to carry out JSON Schema-based verification. The identified criteria were used to evaluate 16 of the most commonly used verification tools in the Kubernetes community. This evaluation revealed several shortcomings in the existing tools.Show less >
Language :
Anglais
Peer reviewed article :
Oui
Audience :
Internationale
Popular science :
Non
Collections :
Source :
Files
- document
- Open access
- Access the document
- icin-camera-ready.pdf
- Open access
- Access the document
- document
- Open access
- Access the document
- icin-camera-ready.pdf
- Open access
- Access the document