Minimally invasive removal of deep ...
Document type :
Compte-rendu et recension critique d'ouvrage
Title :
Minimally invasive removal of deep contraceptive implants under continuous ultrasound guidance is effective, quick, and safe
Author(s) :
Jacques, Thibaut [Auteur]
Radiologie et Imagerie Musculo-Squelettique [CHU Lille]
Brienne, Charlotte [Auteur]
Radiologie et Imagerie Musculo-Squelettique [CHU Lille]
Faculté de Médecine Henri Warembourg - Université de Lille
Henry, Simon [Auteur]
Radiologie et Imagerie Musculo-Squelettique [CHU Lille]
Faculté de Médecine Henri Warembourg - Université de Lille
Baffet, Hortense [Auteur]
Giraudet, Géraldine [Auteur]
Demondion, Xavier [Auteur]
Radiologie et Imagerie Musculo-Squelettique [CHU Lille]
Unité de Taphonomie médico-légale et Anatomie - ULR 7367 [UTML&A]
Faculté de Médecine Henri Warembourg - Université de Lille
Cotten, Anne [Auteur]
Radiologie et Imagerie Musculo-Squelettique [CHU Lille]
Faculté de Médecine Henri Warembourg - Université de Lille
Radiologie et Imagerie Musculo-Squelettique [CHU Lille]
Brienne, Charlotte [Auteur]
Radiologie et Imagerie Musculo-Squelettique [CHU Lille]
Faculté de Médecine Henri Warembourg - Université de Lille
Henry, Simon [Auteur]
Radiologie et Imagerie Musculo-Squelettique [CHU Lille]
Faculté de Médecine Henri Warembourg - Université de Lille
Baffet, Hortense [Auteur]
Giraudet, Géraldine [Auteur]
Demondion, Xavier [Auteur]
Radiologie et Imagerie Musculo-Squelettique [CHU Lille]
Unité de Taphonomie médico-légale et Anatomie - ULR 7367 [UTML&A]
Faculté de Médecine Henri Warembourg - Université de Lille
Cotten, Anne [Auteur]
Radiologie et Imagerie Musculo-Squelettique [CHU Lille]
Faculté de Médecine Henri Warembourg - Université de Lille
Journal title :
European Radiology
Pages :
1718-1725
Publisher :
Springer Verlag
Publication date :
2021-10-14
ISSN :
0938-7994
HAL domain(s) :
Informatique [cs]/Imagerie médicale
English abstract : [en]
Abstract Objectives The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility, performance, and complications of a non-surgical, minimally-invasive procedure of deep contraceptive implant removal under continuous ultrasound ...
Show more >Abstract Objectives The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility, performance, and complications of a non-surgical, minimally-invasive procedure of deep contraceptive implant removal under continuous ultrasound guidance. Methods The ultrasound-guided procedure consisted of local anesthesia using lidocaine chlorhydrate 1% (10 mg/mL) with a 21-G needle, followed by hydrodissection using NaCl 0.9% (9 mg/mL) and implant extraction using a Hartmann grasping microforceps. The parameters studied were the implant localization, success and complication rates, pain throughout the intervention, volumes of lidocaïne and NaCl used, duration of the procedure, and size of the incision. Between November 2019 and January 2021, 45 patients were referred to the musculoskeletal radiology department for ultrasound-guided removal of a deep contraceptive implant and were all retrospectively included. Results All implants were successfully removed en bloc (100%). The mean incision size was 2.7 ± 0.5 mm. The mean duration of the extraction procedure was 7.7 ± 6.3 min. There were no major complications (infection, nerve, or vessel damage). As a minor complication, 21 patients (46.7%) reported a benign superficial skin ecchymosis at the puncture site, spontaneously regressing in less than 1 week. The procedure was very well-tolerated, with low pain rating throughout (1.0 ± 1.5/10 during implant extraction). Conclusions Minimally invasive removal of deep contraceptive implants under continuous ultrasound guidance alone is feasible, effective, and safe. In the present cohort, all implants were successfully removed, whatever the location, with short procedural time, small incision size, low pain levels, and no significant complications. This procedure could become a gold standard in this indication. Key Points • Minimally invasive removal of deep contraceptive implants under continuous ultrasound guidance alone is feasible, which led to a success rate of 100% whatever the location (even close to neurovascular structures), with only a small skin incision (2.7 ± 0.5 mm). • The procedure was safe, quick, without any major complications, and very well tolerated in terms of pain. • This minimally invasive ultrasound-guided procedure could become the future gold standard for the removal of deep contraceptive implants, as an alternative to surgical extraction, even for implants in difficult locations such as subfascial ones or those close to neurovascular structures.Show less >
Show more >Abstract Objectives The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility, performance, and complications of a non-surgical, minimally-invasive procedure of deep contraceptive implant removal under continuous ultrasound guidance. Methods The ultrasound-guided procedure consisted of local anesthesia using lidocaine chlorhydrate 1% (10 mg/mL) with a 21-G needle, followed by hydrodissection using NaCl 0.9% (9 mg/mL) and implant extraction using a Hartmann grasping microforceps. The parameters studied were the implant localization, success and complication rates, pain throughout the intervention, volumes of lidocaïne and NaCl used, duration of the procedure, and size of the incision. Between November 2019 and January 2021, 45 patients were referred to the musculoskeletal radiology department for ultrasound-guided removal of a deep contraceptive implant and were all retrospectively included. Results All implants were successfully removed en bloc (100%). The mean incision size was 2.7 ± 0.5 mm. The mean duration of the extraction procedure was 7.7 ± 6.3 min. There were no major complications (infection, nerve, or vessel damage). As a minor complication, 21 patients (46.7%) reported a benign superficial skin ecchymosis at the puncture site, spontaneously regressing in less than 1 week. The procedure was very well-tolerated, with low pain rating throughout (1.0 ± 1.5/10 during implant extraction). Conclusions Minimally invasive removal of deep contraceptive implants under continuous ultrasound guidance alone is feasible, effective, and safe. In the present cohort, all implants were successfully removed, whatever the location, with short procedural time, small incision size, low pain levels, and no significant complications. This procedure could become a gold standard in this indication. Key Points • Minimally invasive removal of deep contraceptive implants under continuous ultrasound guidance alone is feasible, which led to a success rate of 100% whatever the location (even close to neurovascular structures), with only a small skin incision (2.7 ± 0.5 mm). • The procedure was safe, quick, without any major complications, and very well tolerated in terms of pain. • This minimally invasive ultrasound-guided procedure could become the future gold standard for the removal of deep contraceptive implants, as an alternative to surgical extraction, even for implants in difficult locations such as subfascial ones or those close to neurovascular structures.Show less >
Language :
Anglais
Popular science :
Non
Source :
Files
- s00330-021-08263-4.pdf
- Open access
- Access the document