Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Pharmacogenetic ...
Document type :
Article dans une revue scientifique: Article original
DOI :
Permalink :
Title :
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Pharmacogenetic Testing as Guides to Psychotropic Drug Dose Adjustment: An Observational Study
Author(s) :
Cuvelier, Elodie [Auteur]
Groupe de Recherche sur les formes Injectables et les Technologies Associées - ULR 7365 [GRITA]
Khazri, Houda [Auteur]
Groupe de Recherche sur les formes Injectables et les Technologies Associées - ULR 7365 [GRITA]
Lecluse, Cloé [Auteur]
Hennart, Benjamin [Auteur]
IMPact de l'Environnement Chimique sur la Santé humaine (IMPECS) - ULR 4483
Amad, Ali [Auteur]
Lille Neurosciences & Cognition (LilNCog) - U 1172
Roche, Jean [Auteur]
Tod, Michel [Auteur]
Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive - UMR 5558 [LBBE]
Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 - Institut des Sciences Pharmaceutiques et Biologiques [UCBL ISPB]
Vaiva, Guillaume [Auteur]
Lille Neurosciences & Cognition (LilNCog) - U 1172
Cottencin, Olivier [Auteur]
Laboratoire Sciences Cognitives et Sciences Affectives - UMR 9193 [SCALab]
Odou, Pascal [Auteur]
Groupe de Recherche sur les formes Injectables et les Technologies Associées (GRITA) - ULR 7365
Allorge, Delphine [Auteur]
IMPact de l'Environnement Chimique sur la Santé humaine (IMPECS) - ULR 4483
Décaudin, Bertrand [Auteur]
Groupe de Recherche sur les formes Injectables et les Technologies Associées (GRITA) - ULR 7365
Simon, Nicolas [Auteur]
Groupe de Recherche sur les formes Injectables et les Technologies Associées (GRITA) - ULR 7365

Groupe de Recherche sur les formes Injectables et les Technologies Associées - ULR 7365 [GRITA]
Khazri, Houda [Auteur]
Groupe de Recherche sur les formes Injectables et les Technologies Associées - ULR 7365 [GRITA]
Lecluse, Cloé [Auteur]
Hennart, Benjamin [Auteur]

IMPact de l'Environnement Chimique sur la Santé humaine (IMPECS) - ULR 4483
Amad, Ali [Auteur]

Lille Neurosciences & Cognition (LilNCog) - U 1172
Roche, Jean [Auteur]
Tod, Michel [Auteur]
Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive - UMR 5558 [LBBE]
Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 - Institut des Sciences Pharmaceutiques et Biologiques [UCBL ISPB]
Vaiva, Guillaume [Auteur]

Lille Neurosciences & Cognition (LilNCog) - U 1172
Cottencin, Olivier [Auteur]

Laboratoire Sciences Cognitives et Sciences Affectives - UMR 9193 [SCALab]
Odou, Pascal [Auteur]

Groupe de Recherche sur les formes Injectables et les Technologies Associées (GRITA) - ULR 7365
Allorge, Delphine [Auteur]

IMPact de l'Environnement Chimique sur la Santé humaine (IMPECS) - ULR 4483
Décaudin, Bertrand [Auteur]

Groupe de Recherche sur les formes Injectables et les Technologies Associées (GRITA) - ULR 7365
Simon, Nicolas [Auteur]

Groupe de Recherche sur les formes Injectables et les Technologies Associées (GRITA) - ULR 7365
Journal title :
Pharmaceuticals
Abbreviated title :
Pharmaceuticals
Volume number :
17
Pages :
21
Publisher :
MDPI AG
Publication date :
2023-12-22
ISSN :
1424-8247
HAL domain(s) :
Sciences du Vivant [q-bio]
English abstract : [en]
To avoid the failures in therapy with psychotropic drugs, treatments can be personalized by applying the results of therapeutic drug monitoring and pharmacogenetic testing. The objective of the present single-center ...
Show more >To avoid the failures in therapy with psychotropic drugs, treatments can be personalized by applying the results of therapeutic drug monitoring and pharmacogenetic testing. The objective of the present single-center observational study was to describe the changes in psychotropic drug management prompted by therapeutic drug monitoring and pharmacogenetic testing, and to compare the effective drug concentration based on metabolic status with the dose predicted using an in silico decision tool for drug–drug interactions. The study was conducted in psychiatry wards at Lille University Hospital (Lille, France) between 2016 and 2020. Patients with data for at least one therapeutic drug monitoring session or pharmacogenetic test were included. Blood tests were performed for 490 inpatients (mainly indicated by treatment monitoring or failure) and mainly concerned clozapine (21.4%) and quetiapine (13.7%). Of the 617 initial therapeutic drug monitoring tests, 245 (40%) complied with good sampling practice. Of the patients, 51% had a drug concentration within the therapeutic range. Regardless of the drug concentration, the drug management did not change in 83% of cases. Thirty patients underwent pharmacogenetic testing (twenty-seven had also undergone therapeutic drug monitoring) for treatment failure; the plasma drug concentration was outside the reference range in 93% of cases. The patient’s metabolic status explained the treatment failure in 12 cases (40%), and prompted a switch to a drug metabolized by another CYP450 pathway in 5 cases (42%). Of the six tests that could be analyzed with the in silico decision tool, all of the drug concentrations after adjustment were included in the range estimated by the tool. Knowledge of a patient’s drug concentration and metabolic status (for CYD2D6 and CYP2C19) can help clinicians to optimize psychotropic drug adjustment. Drug management can be optimized with good sampling practice, support from a multidisciplinary team (a physician, a geneticist, and clinical pharmacist), and decision support tools.Show less >
Show more >To avoid the failures in therapy with psychotropic drugs, treatments can be personalized by applying the results of therapeutic drug monitoring and pharmacogenetic testing. The objective of the present single-center observational study was to describe the changes in psychotropic drug management prompted by therapeutic drug monitoring and pharmacogenetic testing, and to compare the effective drug concentration based on metabolic status with the dose predicted using an in silico decision tool for drug–drug interactions. The study was conducted in psychiatry wards at Lille University Hospital (Lille, France) between 2016 and 2020. Patients with data for at least one therapeutic drug monitoring session or pharmacogenetic test were included. Blood tests were performed for 490 inpatients (mainly indicated by treatment monitoring or failure) and mainly concerned clozapine (21.4%) and quetiapine (13.7%). Of the 617 initial therapeutic drug monitoring tests, 245 (40%) complied with good sampling practice. Of the patients, 51% had a drug concentration within the therapeutic range. Regardless of the drug concentration, the drug management did not change in 83% of cases. Thirty patients underwent pharmacogenetic testing (twenty-seven had also undergone therapeutic drug monitoring) for treatment failure; the plasma drug concentration was outside the reference range in 93% of cases. The patient’s metabolic status explained the treatment failure in 12 cases (40%), and prompted a switch to a drug metabolized by another CYP450 pathway in 5 cases (42%). Of the six tests that could be analyzed with the in silico decision tool, all of the drug concentrations after adjustment were included in the range estimated by the tool. Knowledge of a patient’s drug concentration and metabolic status (for CYD2D6 and CYP2C19) can help clinicians to optimize psychotropic drug adjustment. Drug management can be optimized with good sampling practice, support from a multidisciplinary team (a physician, a geneticist, and clinical pharmacist), and decision support tools.Show less >
Peer reviewed article :
Oui
Audience :
Internationale
Popular science :
Non
Administrative institution(s) :
Université de Lille
CHU Lille
Institut Pasteur de Lille
CHU Lille
Institut Pasteur de Lille
Collections :
Submission date :
2024-04-18T13:33:26Z
2024-04-22T09:41:23Z
2024-04-22T09:41:23Z
Files
- Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Pharmacogenetic Testing as Guides to Psychotropic Drug Dose Adjustment- An Observational Study..pdf
- Version éditeur
- Open access
- Access the document