Generation of a core set of items to develop ...
Document type :
Article dans une revue scientifique: Article original
DOI :
PMID :
Permalink :
Title :
Generation of a core set of items to develop classification criteria for Scleroderma renal crisis using consensus methodology.
Author(s) :
Butler, Emily-Ann [Auteur]
Baron, Murray [Auteur]
Fogo, Agnes B [Auteur]
Frech, Tracy [Auteur]
Ghossein, Cybele [Auteur]
Hachulla, Eric [Auteur]
Lille Inflammation Research International Center - U 995 [LIRIC]
Hoa, Sabrina [Auteur]
Johnson, Sindhu R [Auteur]
Khanna, Dinesh [Auteur]
Mouthon, Luc [Auteur]
Université Paris Descartes - Paris 5 [UPD5]
Nikpour, Mandana [Auteur]
Proudman, Susanna [Auteur]
Steen, Virginia [Auteur]
Stern, Edward [Auteur]
Varga, John [Auteur]
Denton, Christopher P. [Auteur]
Hudson, Marie [Auteur]
Baron, Murray [Auteur]
Fogo, Agnes B [Auteur]
Frech, Tracy [Auteur]
Ghossein, Cybele [Auteur]
Hachulla, Eric [Auteur]
Lille Inflammation Research International Center - U 995 [LIRIC]
Hoa, Sabrina [Auteur]
Johnson, Sindhu R [Auteur]
Khanna, Dinesh [Auteur]
Mouthon, Luc [Auteur]
Université Paris Descartes - Paris 5 [UPD5]
Nikpour, Mandana [Auteur]
Proudman, Susanna [Auteur]
Steen, Virginia [Auteur]
Stern, Edward [Auteur]
Varga, John [Auteur]
Denton, Christopher P. [Auteur]
Hudson, Marie [Auteur]
Journal title :
Arthritis & rheumatology
Abbreviated title :
null
Volume number :
71
Pages :
964-971
Publication date :
2019-06
ISSN :
2326-5205
HAL domain(s) :
Sciences du Vivant [q-bio]
English abstract : [en]
OBJECTIVE: To generate a core set of items to develop classification criteria for scleroderma renal crisis (SRC) using consensus methodology.
METHODS: An international, multidisciplinary panel of experts was invited to ...
Show more >OBJECTIVE: To generate a core set of items to develop classification criteria for scleroderma renal crisis (SRC) using consensus methodology. METHODS: An international, multidisciplinary panel of experts was invited to participate in a 3-round Delphi exercise developed using a survey based on items identified by a scoping review. In round 1, participants were asked to identify omissions and clarify ambiguities regarding the items in the survey. In round 2, participants were asked to rate the validity and feasibility of the items using Likert-type scales ranging from 1 to 9 (where 1 = very invalid/unfeasible, 5 = uncertain, and 9 = very valid/feasible). In round 3, participants reviewed the results and comments from round 2 and were asked to provide final ratings. Items rated as highly valid and feasible (median scores ≥7 for each) in round 3 were selected as the provisional core set of items. A consensus meeting using a nominal group technique was conducted to further reduce the core set of items. RESULTS: Ninety-nine experts from 16 countries participated in the Delphi exercise. Of the 31 items in the survey, consensus was achieved on 13, in the categories hypertension, renal insufficiency, proteinuria, and hemolysis. Eleven experts took part in the nominal group technique discussion, where consensus was achieved in 5 domains: blood pressure, acute kidney injury, microangiopathic hemolytic anemia, target organ dysfunction, and renal histopathology. CONCLUSIONS: A core set of items that characterize SRC was identified using consensus methodology. This core set will be used in future data-driven phases of this project to develop classification criteria for SRC.Show less >
Show more >OBJECTIVE: To generate a core set of items to develop classification criteria for scleroderma renal crisis (SRC) using consensus methodology. METHODS: An international, multidisciplinary panel of experts was invited to participate in a 3-round Delphi exercise developed using a survey based on items identified by a scoping review. In round 1, participants were asked to identify omissions and clarify ambiguities regarding the items in the survey. In round 2, participants were asked to rate the validity and feasibility of the items using Likert-type scales ranging from 1 to 9 (where 1 = very invalid/unfeasible, 5 = uncertain, and 9 = very valid/feasible). In round 3, participants reviewed the results and comments from round 2 and were asked to provide final ratings. Items rated as highly valid and feasible (median scores ≥7 for each) in round 3 were selected as the provisional core set of items. A consensus meeting using a nominal group technique was conducted to further reduce the core set of items. RESULTS: Ninety-nine experts from 16 countries participated in the Delphi exercise. Of the 31 items in the survey, consensus was achieved on 13, in the categories hypertension, renal insufficiency, proteinuria, and hemolysis. Eleven experts took part in the nominal group technique discussion, where consensus was achieved in 5 domains: blood pressure, acute kidney injury, microangiopathic hemolytic anemia, target organ dysfunction, and renal histopathology. CONCLUSIONS: A core set of items that characterize SRC was identified using consensus methodology. This core set will be used in future data-driven phases of this project to develop classification criteria for SRC.Show less >
Language :
Anglais
Audience :
Internationale
Popular science :
Non
Administrative institution(s) :
CHU Lille
Inserm
Université de Lille
Inserm
Université de Lille
Submission date :
2019-10-22T08:09:16Z
2024-01-25T13:13:15Z
2024-01-25T13:13:15Z