Title :

Transatlantic differences in management of carotid stenosis: bridging the gap in stroke management (bridge) project

Author(s) :

Balucani, Clotilde [Auteur]
Arnedo, Vanessa [Auteur]
Weedon, Jeremy [Auteur]
LEYS, Didier [Auteur]
Troubles cognitifs dégénératifs et vasculaires - U 1171 - EA 1046 [TCDV]
Troubles cognitifs dégénératifs et vasculaires - U1171
Mas, Jean-Louis [Auteur]
Brown, Martin M. [Auteur]
Grotta, James C. [Auteur]
Gonzales, Nicole R. [Auteur]
Hacke, Werner [Auteur]
Brott, Thomas [Auteur]
Levine, Steven R. [Auteur]

Journal title :

The Neurohospitalist

Abbreviated title :

Neurohospitalist

Volume number :

8

Pages :

113-123

Publication date :

2018-07-01

ISSN :

1941-8744

English keyword(s) :

carotid stenosis
carotid artery diseases
cerebrovascular disorders
stroke

HAL domain(s) :

Sciences du Vivant [q-bio]

English abstract : [en]

Management of carotid stenosis remains controversial despite several trials evaluating carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid angioplasty/stenting (CAS). We compared attitudes in the management of carotid stenosis between ...
Show more >Management of carotid stenosis remains controversial despite several trials evaluating carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid angioplasty/stenting (CAS). We compared attitudes in the management of carotid stenosis between selected experts within Europe and North America. A 3-phase Delphi survey was e-mailed to select stroke experts from Europe (n = 390) and North America (n = 289). Those completing the initial survey were shown all responses after each survey round. Consensus was defined as ≥80% agreement. For phases 1, 2, and 3, response rates were 32%, 62%, and 73%, respectively. Overall, 100 (15%) of 679 participated in all 3 phases, 19% Europeans versus 9% North Americans (PPPP The majority of North American and European respondents did not consider the 2 procedures equivalent and seemed to indicate that CEA was preferred for the management of carotid stenosis. These findings need to be further explored to help establish evidence-based guidelines.Show less >

Language :

Anglais

Audience :

Internationale

Popular science :

Non

Administrative institution(s) :

CHU Lille
CNRS
Inserm
Université de Lille

Collections :

• Lille Neurosciences & Cognition (LilNCog) - U 1172

Research team(s) :

Troubles cognitifs dégénératifs et vasculaires

Submission date :

2019-11-27T13:36:58Z