Irrecist and irecist: the devil is in the details
Document type :
Article dans une revue scientifique: Lettre à l'éditeur
DOI :
PMID :
Permalink :
Title :
Irrecist and irecist: the devil is in the details
Author(s) :
Le Lay, J. [Auteur]
Jarraya, Hajer [Auteur]
Centre Régional de Lutte contre le Cancer Oscar Lambret [Lille] [UNICANCER/Lille]
Lebellec, Loic [Auteur]
Centre Régional de Lutte contre le Cancer Oscar Lambret [Lille] [UNICANCER/Lille]
Penel, Nicolas [Auteur]
Evaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales - ULR 2694 [METRICS]
Jarraya, Hajer [Auteur]
Centre Régional de Lutte contre le Cancer Oscar Lambret [Lille] [UNICANCER/Lille]
Lebellec, Loic [Auteur]
Centre Régional de Lutte contre le Cancer Oscar Lambret [Lille] [UNICANCER/Lille]
Penel, Nicolas [Auteur]
Evaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales - ULR 2694 [METRICS]
Journal title :
Annals of Oncology
Abbreviated title :
Ann. Oncol.
Volume number :
28
Pages :
1676-1678
Publisher :
Elsevier
Publication date :
2017-07-01
ISSN :
0923-7534
HAL domain(s) :
Sciences du Vivant [q-bio]
English abstract : [en]
Modification of tumor size is commonly used to define the activity of investigational new drugs in phase II cancer trials (metric to define objective response) and to measure drug activity in a large portion of phase III ...
Show more >Modification of tumor size is commonly used to define the activity of investigational new drugs in phase II cancer trials (metric to define objective response) and to measure drug activity in a large portion of phase III trials (metric to define progression-free survival or time to progression). The use of standardized criteria to define tumor shrinkage, stable disease, and progressive disease (PD) are of major importance when designing clinical trials and defining endpoints. Different standardized methods have been proposed to objectively measure the tumor size change (WHO criteria, RECIST 1.1) [1]. RECIST 1.1 is undoubtedly accepted as an accurate metric to define burden tumor change with classical chemotherapy agents. The use of RECIST 1.1 is further discussed with regard to molecular targeted therapies [2]. Immune-stimulating agents, such as anti-CTLA4 and anti-PD(L)1 antibodies, induce specific patterns of response with transient pseudo-progression (probably due to immune cells tumor infiltration, inflammation, or necrosis) followed by long-lasting partial response or stable disease in some cases. As a consequence, RECIST-based immune criteria (ir-RECIST) have been proposed to assess pseudo-progression/transient flare [3]. Please note that partial/complete response classically required confirmation 1month later in RECIST 1.1. Currently, ir-RECIST requires confirmation of disease progression 4–6weeks later. However, the definition of confirmed PD largely differs per sponsor (Table 1). In brief, there are at least three major differences: retention of clinical stability as a component of confirmed PD definition (with a precise definition of what is the clinical stability), inclusion of the size of increasing non-target lesions, and the size of new lesions to calculate the overall size compared with the nadir and retention of only new lesion that continue to grow between imaging documenting initial PD and imaging confirming the PD according to ir-RECIST. These discrepancies lead to complexities in patient management within these clinical trials (whether to discontinue the investigational drug) and later at the time of final study analysis. Furthermore, in current and future comparative clinical trials, it will be very interesting to carefully assess the use of ir-RECIST in non-immune-stimulating agent comparative arms, such as chemotherapy or molecular-targeted therapiesShow less >
Show more >Modification of tumor size is commonly used to define the activity of investigational new drugs in phase II cancer trials (metric to define objective response) and to measure drug activity in a large portion of phase III trials (metric to define progression-free survival or time to progression). The use of standardized criteria to define tumor shrinkage, stable disease, and progressive disease (PD) are of major importance when designing clinical trials and defining endpoints. Different standardized methods have been proposed to objectively measure the tumor size change (WHO criteria, RECIST 1.1) [1]. RECIST 1.1 is undoubtedly accepted as an accurate metric to define burden tumor change with classical chemotherapy agents. The use of RECIST 1.1 is further discussed with regard to molecular targeted therapies [2]. Immune-stimulating agents, such as anti-CTLA4 and anti-PD(L)1 antibodies, induce specific patterns of response with transient pseudo-progression (probably due to immune cells tumor infiltration, inflammation, or necrosis) followed by long-lasting partial response or stable disease in some cases. As a consequence, RECIST-based immune criteria (ir-RECIST) have been proposed to assess pseudo-progression/transient flare [3]. Please note that partial/complete response classically required confirmation 1month later in RECIST 1.1. Currently, ir-RECIST requires confirmation of disease progression 4–6weeks later. However, the definition of confirmed PD largely differs per sponsor (Table 1). In brief, there are at least three major differences: retention of clinical stability as a component of confirmed PD definition (with a precise definition of what is the clinical stability), inclusion of the size of increasing non-target lesions, and the size of new lesions to calculate the overall size compared with the nadir and retention of only new lesion that continue to grow between imaging documenting initial PD and imaging confirming the PD according to ir-RECIST. These discrepancies lead to complexities in patient management within these clinical trials (whether to discontinue the investigational drug) and later at the time of final study analysis. Furthermore, in current and future comparative clinical trials, it will be very interesting to carefully assess the use of ir-RECIST in non-immune-stimulating agent comparative arms, such as chemotherapy or molecular-targeted therapiesShow less >
Language :
Anglais
Audience :
Internationale
Popular science :
Non
Administrative institution(s) :
CHU Lille
Université de Lille
Université de Lille
Submission date :
2019-12-09T16:54:49Z
2024-12-18T09:30:07Z
2024-12-18T09:30:07Z