Arguing over Goals for Negotiation: Adopting ...
Document type :
Compte-rendu et recension critique d'ouvrage
Title :
Arguing over Goals for Negotiation: Adopting an Assumption-Based Argumentation Decision Support System
Author(s) :
Morge, Maxime [Auteur]
Laboratoire d'Informatique Fondamentale de Lille [LIFL]
Systèmes Multi-Agents et Comportements [SMAC]
Dipartimento di Informatica [Pisa]
Dipartimento di Informatica [Pisa] [DI]
Mancarella, Paolo [Auteur]
Dipartimento di Informatica [Pisa] [DI]
Laboratoire d'Informatique Fondamentale de Lille [LIFL]
Systèmes Multi-Agents et Comportements [SMAC]
Dipartimento di Informatica [Pisa]
Dipartimento di Informatica [Pisa] [DI]
Mancarella, Paolo [Auteur]
Dipartimento di Informatica [Pisa] [DI]
Journal title :
Group Decision and Negotiation
Pages :
979-1012
Publisher :
INFORMS
Publication date :
2014
ISSN :
0926-2644
HAL domain(s) :
Informatique [cs]/Intelligence artificielle [cs.AI]
English abstract : [en]
Computational models of argumentation has been put forward as a promising approach to support decision making. In this context several recent works have proposed argumentation-based frameworks for decision making. In this ...
Show more >Computational models of argumentation has been put forward as a promising approach to support decision making. In this context several recent works have proposed argumentation-based frameworks for decision making. In this paper we describe an application based on an argumentation-based mechanism for decision-making to concede. Adopting the assumption-based approach of argumentation, we propose an argumentation framework in which preferences are attached to goals. Arguments are defined as tree-like structures. Our framework is equipped with a computational counterpart for solving a decision problem, modeling the intuition that high-ranked goals are preferred to low-ranked goals which can be withdrawn. In this way, our framework suggests some decisions and provides an interactive and intelligible explanation of this choice. Our implementation, called MARGO, has been used for service selection within the ArguGRID project. We illustrate our approach with an industrial application, and illustrate the operation of the system with a running example.Show less >
Show more >Computational models of argumentation has been put forward as a promising approach to support decision making. In this context several recent works have proposed argumentation-based frameworks for decision making. In this paper we describe an application based on an argumentation-based mechanism for decision-making to concede. Adopting the assumption-based approach of argumentation, we propose an argumentation framework in which preferences are attached to goals. Arguments are defined as tree-like structures. Our framework is equipped with a computational counterpart for solving a decision problem, modeling the intuition that high-ranked goals are preferred to low-ranked goals which can be withdrawn. In this way, our framework suggests some decisions and provides an interactive and intelligible explanation of this choice. Our implementation, called MARGO, has been used for service selection within the ArguGRID project. We illustrate our approach with an industrial application, and illustrate the operation of the system with a running example.Show less >
Language :
Anglais
Popular science :
Non
Collections :
Source :
Files
- https://openresearchlibrary.org/ext/api/media/0af241e5-de05-49e6-806d-2fbaeae0cf4b/assets/external_content.pdf
- Open access
- Access the document
- external_content.pdf
- Open access
- Access the document