Log versus linear timing in human temporal ...
Document type :
Article dans une revue scientifique
DOI :
PMID :
Permalink :
Title :
Log versus linear timing in human temporal bisection: A signal detection theory study.
Author(s) :
Jozefowiez, Jeremie [Auteur]
Laboratoire Sciences Cognitives et Sciences Affectives - UMR 9193 [SCALab]
Gaudichon, Clément [Auteur]
Laboratoire Sciences Cognitives et Sciences Affectives - UMR 9193 [SCALab]
Mekkass, Francis [Auteur]
Laboratoire Sciences Cognitives et Sciences Affectives - UMR 9193 [SCALab]
Machado, Armando [Auteur]
Universidade do Minho = University of Minho [Braga]
Laboratoire Sciences Cognitives et Sciences Affectives - UMR 9193 [SCALab]
Gaudichon, Clément [Auteur]
Laboratoire Sciences Cognitives et Sciences Affectives - UMR 9193 [SCALab]
Mekkass, Francis [Auteur]
Laboratoire Sciences Cognitives et Sciences Affectives - UMR 9193 [SCALab]
Machado, Armando [Auteur]
Universidade do Minho = University of Minho [Braga]
Journal title :
Journal of experimental psychology. Animal learning and cognition
Abbreviated title :
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn
Volume number :
44
Pages :
396-408
Publication date :
2018-10-01
ISSN :
2329-8464
English keyword(s) :
Adolescent
Adult
Correlation of Data
Female
Humans
Male
Normal Distribution
Photic Stimulation
Psychometrics
Signal Detection, Psychological
Time Factors
Time Perception
Young Adult
Adult
Correlation of Data
Female
Humans
Male
Normal Distribution
Photic Stimulation
Psychometrics
Signal Detection, Psychological
Time Factors
Time Perception
Young Adult
HAL domain(s) :
Sciences cognitives
English abstract : [en]
Using signal detection theory, we investigated whether human participants represent time linearly or logarithmically in a bisection task. Participants saw a stimulus 1.0 to 1.5 s in duration, and then judged whether the ...
Show more >Using signal detection theory, we investigated whether human participants represent time linearly or logarithmically in a bisection task. Participants saw a stimulus 1.0 to 1.5 s in duration, and then judged whether the stimulus duration was closer to 1.0 s or to 1.5 s, and how sure they were of their response. Whereas the mean of the subjective stimulus duration was a linear function of the objective stimulus duration, participants produced remarkably different psychophysical functions-linear for some participants, concave for others, and convex for still others. Hence, the appropriate question might not be whether humans encode time linearly or logarithmically, but for which participants and under which conditions is time encoded linearly, logarithmically, or even exponentially. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).Show less >
Show more >Using signal detection theory, we investigated whether human participants represent time linearly or logarithmically in a bisection task. Participants saw a stimulus 1.0 to 1.5 s in duration, and then judged whether the stimulus duration was closer to 1.0 s or to 1.5 s, and how sure they were of their response. Whereas the mean of the subjective stimulus duration was a linear function of the objective stimulus duration, participants produced remarkably different psychophysical functions-linear for some participants, concave for others, and convex for still others. Hence, the appropriate question might not be whether humans encode time linearly or logarithmically, but for which participants and under which conditions is time encoded linearly, logarithmically, or even exponentially. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).Show less >
Language :
Anglais
Audience :
Non spécifiée
Administrative institution(s) :
Université de Lille
CNRS
CHU Lille
CNRS
CHU Lille
Submission date :
2020-12-18T10:30:25Z
2021-01-04T08:41:29Z
2021-01-04T08:41:29Z
Files
- finalbisectionmanuscript.pdf
- Version finale acceptée pour publication (postprint)
- Open access
- Access the document