Log versus linear timing in human temporal ...
Type de document :
Article dans une revue scientifique
DOI :
PMID :
URL permanente :
Titre :
Log versus linear timing in human temporal bisection: A signal detection theory study.
Auteur(s) :
Jozefowiez, Jeremie [Auteur]
Laboratoire Sciences Cognitives et Sciences Affectives - UMR 9193 [SCALab]
Gaudichon, Clément [Auteur]
Laboratoire Sciences Cognitives et Sciences Affectives - UMR 9193 [SCALab]
Mekkass, Francis [Auteur]
Laboratoire Sciences Cognitives et Sciences Affectives - UMR 9193 [SCALab]
Machado, Armando [Auteur]
Universidade do Minho = University of Minho [Braga]
Laboratoire Sciences Cognitives et Sciences Affectives - UMR 9193 [SCALab]
Gaudichon, Clément [Auteur]
Laboratoire Sciences Cognitives et Sciences Affectives - UMR 9193 [SCALab]
Mekkass, Francis [Auteur]
Laboratoire Sciences Cognitives et Sciences Affectives - UMR 9193 [SCALab]
Machado, Armando [Auteur]
Universidade do Minho = University of Minho [Braga]
Titre de la revue :
Journal of experimental psychology. Animal learning and cognition
Nom court de la revue :
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn
Numéro :
44
Pagination :
396-408
Date de publication :
2018-10-01
ISSN :
2329-8464
Mot(s)-clé(s) en anglais :
Adolescent
Adult
Correlation of Data
Female
Humans
Male
Normal Distribution
Photic Stimulation
Psychometrics
Signal Detection, Psychological
Time Factors
Time Perception
Young Adult
Adult
Correlation of Data
Female
Humans
Male
Normal Distribution
Photic Stimulation
Psychometrics
Signal Detection, Psychological
Time Factors
Time Perception
Young Adult
Discipline(s) HAL :
Sciences cognitives
Résumé en anglais : [en]
Using signal detection theory, we investigated whether human participants represent time linearly or logarithmically in a bisection task. Participants saw a stimulus 1.0 to 1.5 s in duration, and then judged whether the ...
Lire la suite >Using signal detection theory, we investigated whether human participants represent time linearly or logarithmically in a bisection task. Participants saw a stimulus 1.0 to 1.5 s in duration, and then judged whether the stimulus duration was closer to 1.0 s or to 1.5 s, and how sure they were of their response. Whereas the mean of the subjective stimulus duration was a linear function of the objective stimulus duration, participants produced remarkably different psychophysical functions-linear for some participants, concave for others, and convex for still others. Hence, the appropriate question might not be whether humans encode time linearly or logarithmically, but for which participants and under which conditions is time encoded linearly, logarithmically, or even exponentially. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).Lire moins >
Lire la suite >Using signal detection theory, we investigated whether human participants represent time linearly or logarithmically in a bisection task. Participants saw a stimulus 1.0 to 1.5 s in duration, and then judged whether the stimulus duration was closer to 1.0 s or to 1.5 s, and how sure they were of their response. Whereas the mean of the subjective stimulus duration was a linear function of the objective stimulus duration, participants produced remarkably different psychophysical functions-linear for some participants, concave for others, and convex for still others. Hence, the appropriate question might not be whether humans encode time linearly or logarithmically, but for which participants and under which conditions is time encoded linearly, logarithmically, or even exponentially. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).Lire moins >
Langue :
Anglais
Audience :
Non spécifiée
Établissement(s) :
Université de Lille
CNRS
CHU Lille
CNRS
CHU Lille
Date de dépôt :
2020-12-18T10:30:25Z
2021-01-04T08:41:29Z
2021-01-04T08:41:29Z
Fichiers
- finalbisectionmanuscript.pdf
- Version finale acceptée pour publication (postprint)
- Accès libre
- Accéder au document