Titre :

Match between therapeutic proposal in multidisciplinary tumor board and actual treatment in head and neck cancer

Auteur(s) :

Alkasbi, J. [Auteur]
Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire [CHU Lille] [CHRU Lille]
Mortuaire, Geoffrey [Auteur]
Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire [CHU Lille] [CHRU Lille]
Rysman, Benedicte [Auteur]
Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire [CHU Lille] [CHRU Lille]
Nicot, R. [Auteur]
Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire [CHU Lille] [CHRU Lille]
Chevalier, D. [Auteur]
Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire [CHU Lille] [CHRU Lille]
Mouawad, F. [Auteur]
Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire [CHU Lille] [CHRU Lille]

Titre de la revue :

European annals of otorhinolaryngology, head and neck diseases

Nom court de la revue :

Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis

Date de publication :

2020-11-27

ISSN :

1879-730X

Discipline(s) HAL :

Sciences du Vivant [q-bio]

Résumé en anglais : [en]

OBJECTIVE: There are few published studies evaluating the quality and outcome of multidisciplinary tumor board (MDTB) decisions. The aim of the present study was to evaluate adherence to MDTB recommendations in head and ...
Lire la suite >OBJECTIVE: There are few published studies evaluating the quality and outcome of multidisciplinary tumor board (MDTB) decisions. The aim of the present study was to evaluate adherence to MDTB recommendations in head and neck cancer and to document reasons in case of discordance. METHODS: We included all patients with newly diagnosed head and neck cancer presented in our MDTB meetings between January 1st and December 31st, 2018, whatever the tumor site, histology type and TNM classification. MDTB recommendations were compared to actual treatment. Discordance was defined as treatment partially or entirely different from the treatment decision recorded in the MDTB minutes. RESULTS: Board decisions were made for 344 new patients. Complete treatment concordance rate was 91.6% (315/344 patients), with deviation in 29 patients. Reasons for deviation were complications of treatment in 10 cases, patient refusal in 8, and physician's decision in 4 cases. Five patients died before therapy initiation. Mean interval from board discussion to treatment was 21 days, and depended on type of treatment (range, 1 to 74 days). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows the importance of evaluating concordance between the protocol proposed in the MDTB and the treatment actually received, to identify factors for deviation and remedy them when possible.Lire moins >

Langue :

Anglais

Audience :

Internationale

Vulgarisation :

Non

Établissement(s) :

CHU Lille
Inserm
Université de Lille

Collections :

• Institut de Recherche Translationnelle sur l'Inflammation (INFINITE) - U1286

Date de dépôt :

2021-07-06T12:44:58Z
2024-01-31T14:58:43Z