Conflict between object structural and ...
Type de document :
Article dans une revue scientifique
PMID :
URL permanente :
Titre :
Conflict between object structural and functional affordances in peripersonal space
Auteur(s) :
KALENINE, SOLENE [Auteur]
Laboratoire Sciences Cognitives et Sciences Affectives - UMR 9193 [SCALab]
Wamain, Yannick [Auteur]
Laboratoire Sciences Cognitives et Sciences Affectives - UMR 9193 [SCALab]
Laboratoire Sciences Cognitives et Sciences Affectives - UMR 9193 [SCALab]
Decroix, Jeremy [Auteur]
Laboratoire Sciences Cognitives et Sciences Affectives - UMR 9193 [SCALab]
Laboratoire Sciences Cognitives et Sciences Affectives - UMR 9193 [SCALab]
Coello, Yann [Auteur]
Laboratoire Sciences Cognitives et Sciences Affectives - UMR 9193 [SCALab]
Laboratoire Sciences Cognitives et Sciences Affectives - UMR 9193 [SCALab]
Laboratoire Sciences Cognitives et Sciences Affectives - UMR 9193 [SCALab]
Wamain, Yannick [Auteur]
Laboratoire Sciences Cognitives et Sciences Affectives - UMR 9193 [SCALab]
Laboratoire Sciences Cognitives et Sciences Affectives - UMR 9193 [SCALab]
Decroix, Jeremy [Auteur]
Laboratoire Sciences Cognitives et Sciences Affectives - UMR 9193 [SCALab]
Laboratoire Sciences Cognitives et Sciences Affectives - UMR 9193 [SCALab]
Coello, Yann [Auteur]
Laboratoire Sciences Cognitives et Sciences Affectives - UMR 9193 [SCALab]
Laboratoire Sciences Cognitives et Sciences Affectives - UMR 9193 [SCALab]
Titre de la revue :
Cognition
Nom court de la revue :
Cognition
Numéro :
155
Pagination :
1-7
Éditeur :
Elsevier
Date de publication :
2016-10
ISSN :
0010-0277
Mot(s)-clé(s) en anglais :
Affordances
Action selection
Manipulable objects
Space
Virtual reality
Action selection
Manipulable objects
Space
Virtual reality
Discipline(s) HAL :
Sciences cognitives
Résumé en anglais : [en]
Recent studies indicate that competition between conflicting action representations slows down planning of object-directed actions. The present study aims to assess whether similar conflict effects exist during manipulable ...
Lire la suite >Recent studies indicate that competition between conflicting action representations slows down planning of object-directed actions. The present study aims to assess whether similar conflict effects exist during manipulable object perception. Twenty-six young adults performed reach-to-grasp and semantic judgements on conflictual objects (with competing structural and functional gestures) and non-conflictual objects (with similar structural and functional gestures) presented at difference distances in a 3D virtual environment. Results highlight a space-dependent conflict between structural and functional affordances. Perceptual judgments on conflictual objects were slower that perceptual judgments on non-conflictual objects, but only when objects were presented within reach. Findings demonstrate that competition between structural and functional affordances during object perception induces a processing cost, and further show that object position in space can bias affordance competition.Lire moins >
Lire la suite >Recent studies indicate that competition between conflicting action representations slows down planning of object-directed actions. The present study aims to assess whether similar conflict effects exist during manipulable object perception. Twenty-six young adults performed reach-to-grasp and semantic judgements on conflictual objects (with competing structural and functional gestures) and non-conflictual objects (with similar structural and functional gestures) presented at difference distances in a 3D virtual environment. Results highlight a space-dependent conflict between structural and functional affordances. Perceptual judgments on conflictual objects were slower that perceptual judgments on non-conflictual objects, but only when objects were presented within reach. Findings demonstrate that competition between structural and functional affordances during object perception induces a processing cost, and further show that object position in space can bias affordance competition.Lire moins >
Langue :
Anglais
Comité de lecture :
Oui
Audience :
Internationale
Vulgarisation :
Non
Établissement(s) :
Université de Lille
CNRS
CHU Lille
CNRS
CHU Lille
Équipe(s) de recherche :
Équipe Action, Vision et Apprentissage (AVA)
Date de dépôt :
2019-02-13T14:21:45Z
2019-11-12T10:48:07Z
2020-03-13T10:16:11Z
2020-10-14T14:24:13Z
2020-10-14T14:28:35Z
2020-10-15T07:14:56Z
2021-01-22T15:47:00Z
2019-11-12T10:48:07Z
2020-03-13T10:16:11Z
2020-10-14T14:24:13Z
2020-10-14T14:28:35Z
2020-10-15T07:14:56Z
2021-01-22T15:47:00Z
Fichiers
- KalenineWamainDecroixCoello_Cognition16.pdf
- Version éditeur
- Accès confidentiel
- Accéder au document