From the university classroom to the TED ...
Type de document :
Partie d'ouvrage
Titre :
From the university classroom to the TED stage: Exploring research promotion as professional practice
Auteur(s) :
Caliendo, Giuditta [Auteur]
Savoirs, Textes, Langage (STL) - UMR 8163 [STL]
Compagnone, Antonio [Auteur]

Savoirs, Textes, Langage (STL) - UMR 8163 [STL]
Compagnone, Antonio [Auteur]
Éditeur(s) ou directeur(s) scientifique(s) :
Paola Catenaccio (ed.)
Roxanne Doerr (ed.)
Giuliana Garzone (ed.)
Kim Grego (ed.)
Roxanne Doerr (ed.)
Giuliana Garzone (ed.)
Kim Grego (ed.)
Titre de l’ouvrage :
Specialised and Professional Discourse across Media and Genres
Éditeur :
Ledizioni
Lieu de publication :
Milan
Date de publication :
2017
Discipline(s) HAL :
Sciences de l'Homme et Société/Linguistique
Résumé en anglais : [en]
This paper explores ways in which academics construct their image as experts and promote their research to achieve their professional objectives (e.g. disseminating knowledge and getting their projects funded) by drawing ...
Lire la suite >This paper explores ways in which academics construct their image as experts and promote their research to achieve their professional objectives (e.g. disseminating knowledge and getting their projects funded) by drawing on the web-mediated genre of TED talks, popularizing speeches that are freely available online and delivered by experts in different fields. For the purpose of this study, a contrastive discourse analysis is carried out by comparing a corpus of TED talks delivered by academics (TED_ac) to a corpus of university lectures (MICASE_lect) drawn from the Michigan Corpus of Academic Spoken English. More precisely, consideration is given to the use of the pronoun we in the two corpora. Previous research shed light on the saliency of we in academic TED talks demonstrating that, unlike university lecturers, academic TED speakers make use of we mostly with an ‘audience-exclusive’ value, thereby presenting and marketing themselves as members of a group of researchers. Against this backdrop, drawing upon the notion of “lexical aspect” or Aktionsart, the verb collocates of we in TED_ac and MICASE_lect are analyzed on the basis of the four main lexical categories of activities, states, accomplishments and achievements to explore the discursive functions performed by the pronoun we in the two genres under scrutiny.Lire moins >
Lire la suite >This paper explores ways in which academics construct their image as experts and promote their research to achieve their professional objectives (e.g. disseminating knowledge and getting their projects funded) by drawing on the web-mediated genre of TED talks, popularizing speeches that are freely available online and delivered by experts in different fields. For the purpose of this study, a contrastive discourse analysis is carried out by comparing a corpus of TED talks delivered by academics (TED_ac) to a corpus of university lectures (MICASE_lect) drawn from the Michigan Corpus of Academic Spoken English. More precisely, consideration is given to the use of the pronoun we in the two corpora. Previous research shed light on the saliency of we in academic TED talks demonstrating that, unlike university lecturers, academic TED speakers make use of we mostly with an ‘audience-exclusive’ value, thereby presenting and marketing themselves as members of a group of researchers. Against this backdrop, drawing upon the notion of “lexical aspect” or Aktionsart, the verb collocates of we in TED_ac and MICASE_lect are analyzed on the basis of the four main lexical categories of activities, states, accomplishments and achievements to explore the discursive functions performed by the pronoun we in the two genres under scrutiny.Lire moins >
Langue :
Anglais
Audience :
Internationale
Vulgarisation :
Oui
Collections :
Source :