How language impacts memory of motion ...
Type de document :
Compte-rendu et recension critique d'ouvrage
PMID :
Titre :
How language impacts memory of motion events in English and French
Auteur(s) :
Engemann, Helen [Auteur]
Free University of Bozen-Bolzano
Hendriks, Henriëtte [Auteur]
University of Cambridge [UK] [CAM]
Hickmann, Maya [Auteur]
Structures Formelles du Langage [SFL]
Soroli, Eva [Auteur]
Université de Lille
Savoirs, Textes, Langage (STL) - UMR 8163 [STL]
Vincent, Coralie [Auteur]
Structures Formelles du Langage [SFL]
Free University of Bozen-Bolzano
Hendriks, Henriëtte [Auteur]
University of Cambridge [UK] [CAM]
Hickmann, Maya [Auteur]
Structures Formelles du Langage [SFL]
Soroli, Eva [Auteur]

Université de Lille
Savoirs, Textes, Langage (STL) - UMR 8163 [STL]
Vincent, Coralie [Auteur]
Structures Formelles du Langage [SFL]
Titre de la revue :
Cognitive Processing
Pagination :
209-213
Éditeur :
Springer Verlag
Date de publication :
2015-08
ISSN :
1612-4782
Mot(s)-clé(s) en anglais :
Spatial cognition
cross-linguistic variation
motion events
memory
language and thought
cross-linguistic variation
motion events
memory
language and thought
Discipline(s) HAL :
Sciences de l'Homme et Société/Linguistique
Sciences de l'Homme et Société/Psychologie
Sciences de l'Homme et Société/Psychologie
Résumé en anglais : [en]
This paper examines whether cross-linguistic differences in motion encoding affect event processing, specifically memory performance. We compared speakers of two languages which differ strikingly in how they habitually ...
Lire la suite >This paper examines whether cross-linguistic differences in motion encoding affect event processing, specifically memory performance. We compared speakers of two languages which differ strikingly in how they habitually encode MANNER and PATH of motion (Talmy 2000). We tested French and English adult native speakers across three tasks that recruited and/or suppressed verbal processing to different extents: verbal event descriptions elicited on the basis of dynamic motion stimuli, a verbal memory task testing the impact of prior verbalisation on target recognition, and a non-verbal memory task, using a dual-task paradigm to suppress internal verbalisation. Results showed significant group differences in the verbal description task, which mirrored expected typological tendencies. English speakers more frequently expressed both MANNER and PATH information than French speakers, who produced more descriptions encoding either PATH or MANNER alone. However, these differences in linguistic encoding did not significantly affect speakers' memory performance in the memory recognition tasks, neither in the verbal nor in the non-verbal condition. The findings contribute to current debates regarding the conditions under which language effects occur and the relative weight of language-specific and universal constraints on spatial cognition.Lire moins >
Lire la suite >This paper examines whether cross-linguistic differences in motion encoding affect event processing, specifically memory performance. We compared speakers of two languages which differ strikingly in how they habitually encode MANNER and PATH of motion (Talmy 2000). We tested French and English adult native speakers across three tasks that recruited and/or suppressed verbal processing to different extents: verbal event descriptions elicited on the basis of dynamic motion stimuli, a verbal memory task testing the impact of prior verbalisation on target recognition, and a non-verbal memory task, using a dual-task paradigm to suppress internal verbalisation. Results showed significant group differences in the verbal description task, which mirrored expected typological tendencies. English speakers more frequently expressed both MANNER and PATH information than French speakers, who produced more descriptions encoding either PATH or MANNER alone. However, these differences in linguistic encoding did not significantly affect speakers' memory performance in the memory recognition tasks, neither in the verbal nor in the non-verbal condition. The findings contribute to current debates regarding the conditions under which language effects occur and the relative weight of language-specific and universal constraints on spatial cognition.Lire moins >
Langue :
Anglais
Vulgarisation :
Non
Projet ANR :
Collections :
Source :
Fichiers
- https://hal.univ-lille.fr/hal-03386382/file/Engemann_Hendriks_Hickman_Soroli%20et%20al_2015_submission_final_30042015%20%281%29.pdf
- Accès libre
- Accéder au document
- https://hal.univ-lille.fr/hal-03386382/file/Engemann_Hendriks_Hickman_Soroli%20et%20al_2015_submission_final_30042015%20%281%29.pdf
- Accès libre
- Accéder au document
- https://hal.univ-lille.fr/hal-03386382/file/Engemann_Hendriks_Hickman_Soroli%20et%20al_2015_submission_final_30042015%20%281%29.pdf
- Accès libre
- Accéder au document
- Engemann_Hendriks_Hickman_Soroli%20et%20al_2015_submission_final_30042015%20%281%29.pdf
- Accès libre
- Accéder au document
- document
- Accès libre
- Accéder au document
- Engemann_Hendriks_Hickman_Soroli%20et%20al_2015_submission_final_30042015.pdf
- Accès libre
- Accéder au document