Wyclif on the felicity (conditions) of marriage
Document type :
Compte-rendu et recension critique d'ouvrage
DOI :
Title :
Wyclif on the felicity (conditions) of marriage
Author(s) :
Journal title :
Vivarium
Pages :
258-274
Publisher :
Brill Academic Publishers
Publication date :
2011
ISSN :
0042-7543
English keyword(s) :
medieval philosophy
philosophy of language
pragmatics
John Wyclif
J.L. Austin
J. Searle
philosophy of language
pragmatics
John Wyclif
J.L. Austin
J. Searle
English abstract : [en]
Regarding marriage, John Wyclif defends the following position: strictly speaking, no words or any kind of sensory signs would be needed, since the consensus of the spouses together with God's approbation would suffice for ...
Show more >Regarding marriage, John Wyclif defends the following position: strictly speaking, no words or any kind of sensory signs would be needed, since the consensus of the spouses together with God's approbation would suffice for the accomplishment of marriage. But if words do have to be pronounced, then the appropriate formula should not be in the present, but in the future. In the following, I shall discuss Wyclif 's arguments by comparing them with some other medieval positions, as well as with some elements of contemporary theories of speech acts. It will appear that in his analysis of the only sacrament which is a "social act" in the literal sense of the expression, Wyclif (i) clearly acknowledges the central role of individual intentions behind (linguistic) conventions, and (ii) carefully distinguishes between the different, chronologically disparate acts involved in marriage and their respective (semantic, psychological and factual) felicity conditions.Show less >
Show more >Regarding marriage, John Wyclif defends the following position: strictly speaking, no words or any kind of sensory signs would be needed, since the consensus of the spouses together with God's approbation would suffice for the accomplishment of marriage. But if words do have to be pronounced, then the appropriate formula should not be in the present, but in the future. In the following, I shall discuss Wyclif 's arguments by comparing them with some other medieval positions, as well as with some elements of contemporary theories of speech acts. It will appear that in his analysis of the only sacrament which is a "social act" in the literal sense of the expression, Wyclif (i) clearly acknowledges the central role of individual intentions behind (linguistic) conventions, and (ii) carefully distinguishes between the different, chronologically disparate acts involved in marriage and their respective (semantic, psychological and factual) felicity conditions.Show less >
Language :
Anglais
Popular science :
Non
Collections :
Source :
Files
- https://api.istex.fr/document/698FF128EE0FF482CA4E8F2C63D47DBB4F5CBDDC/fulltext/pdf?sid=hal
- Open access
- Access the document
- https://api.istex.fr/document/698FF128EE0FF482CA4E8F2C63D47DBB4F5CBDDC/fulltext/pdf?sid=hal
- Open access
- Access the document
- https://api.istex.fr/document/698FF128EE0FF482CA4E8F2C63D47DBB4F5CBDDC/fulltext/pdf?sid=hal
- Open access
- Access the document
- https://api.istex.fr/document/698FF128EE0FF482CA4E8F2C63D47DBB4F5CBDDC/fulltext/pdf?sid=hal
- Open access
- Access the document
- Open access
- Access the document
- fulltext.pdf
- Open access
- Access the document