Beyond investigation-relevant information: ...
Document type :
Article dans une revue scientifique: Article original
Permalink :
Title :
Beyond investigation-relevant information: a content analysis of police questioning
Author(s) :
Launay, Céline [Auteur]
Cognition, langues, langage, ergonomie [CLLE]
Py, Jacques [Auteur]
Cognition, Langues, Langage, Ergonomie [CLLE-LTC]
BRUNEL, Maïté [Auteur]
Psychologie : Interactions, Temps, Émotions, Cognition (PSITEC) - ULR 4072
Demarchi, Samuel [Auteur]
Cognitions Humaine et ARTificielle [CHART]
Cognition, langues, langage, ergonomie [CLLE]
Py, Jacques [Auteur]
Cognition, Langues, Langage, Ergonomie [CLLE-LTC]
BRUNEL, Maïté [Auteur]
Psychologie : Interactions, Temps, Émotions, Cognition (PSITEC) - ULR 4072
Demarchi, Samuel [Auteur]
Cognitions Humaine et ARTificielle [CHART]
Journal title :
Police Practice and Research
Abbreviated title :
Police Practice and Research
Volume number :
22
Pages :
1341-1355
Publisher :
Informa UK Limited
Publication date :
2021-01-05
ISSN :
1561-4263
HAL domain(s) :
Sciences cognitives
English abstract : [en]
There are two primary investigative interview objectives: gathering information to determine what happened and who did it and assessing the witness’s reliability. The present study examined to what extent investigative ...
Show more >There are two primary investigative interview objectives: gathering information to determine what happened and who did it and assessing the witness’s reliability. The present study examined to what extent investigative interviewers gather investigation-relevant information (IRI) compared to interviewee details (ID) to assess witness reliability. As part of a training course, 42 police officers participated as interviewers and mock witnesses by viewing a crime video. The interviews were recorded and rated for question type and question content through thematic analyses. IRI questions accounted for 78% of the questions asked, while ID questions accounted for 22% of the questions asked. The police officers assessed the way witnesses perceived this information and the attendant meta-processes and used more inappropriate questions than appropriate questions. These results help to elucidate the objectives of police interviews that should be considered when evaluating witness performances in laboratory settings and when developing effective interviewing protocols.Show less >
Show more >There are two primary investigative interview objectives: gathering information to determine what happened and who did it and assessing the witness’s reliability. The present study examined to what extent investigative interviewers gather investigation-relevant information (IRI) compared to interviewee details (ID) to assess witness reliability. As part of a training course, 42 police officers participated as interviewers and mock witnesses by viewing a crime video. The interviews were recorded and rated for question type and question content through thematic analyses. IRI questions accounted for 78% of the questions asked, while ID questions accounted for 22% of the questions asked. The police officers assessed the way witnesses perceived this information and the attendant meta-processes and used more inappropriate questions than appropriate questions. These results help to elucidate the objectives of police interviews that should be considered when evaluating witness performances in laboratory settings and when developing effective interviewing protocols.Show less >
Language :
Anglais
Peer reviewed article :
Oui
Audience :
Internationale
Administrative institution(s) :
Université de Lille
Research team(s) :
Justice & Travail
Submission date :
2022-05-03T11:42:29Z
2022-05-04T07:25:17Z
2022-05-04T07:25:17Z