Mucormycosis in Burn Patients
Document type :
Article dans une revue scientifique: Article de synthèse/Review paper
DOI :
PMID :
Permalink :
Title :
Mucormycosis in Burn Patients
Author(s) :
Devauchelle, Pauline [Auteur]
Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire [CHU Lille] [CHRU Lille]
JEANNE, MATHIEU [Auteur]
Centre d'Investigation Clinique - Innovation Technologique de Lille - CIC 1403 - CIC 9301 [CIC Lille]
Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire [CHU Lille] [CHRU Lille]
Frealle, Emilie [Auteur]
Service de Parasitologie-Mycologie [CHRU LIlle]
Centre d’Infection et d’Immunité de Lille - INSERM U 1019 - UMR 9017 - UMR 8204 [CIIL]
Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire [CHU Lille] [CHRU Lille]
JEANNE, MATHIEU [Auteur]

Centre d'Investigation Clinique - Innovation Technologique de Lille - CIC 1403 - CIC 9301 [CIC Lille]
Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire [CHU Lille] [CHRU Lille]
Frealle, Emilie [Auteur]

Service de Parasitologie-Mycologie [CHRU LIlle]
Centre d’Infection et d’Immunité de Lille - INSERM U 1019 - UMR 9017 - UMR 8204 [CIIL]
Journal title :
Journal of Fungi
Abbreviated title :
J Fungi (Basel)
Volume number :
5
Publisher :
MDPI
Publication date :
2019-03-30
ISSN :
2309-608X
English keyword(s) :
mucormycosis
burn
cutaneous
qPCR
outbreak
molecular typing
environmental source
nosocomial
Saksenaea
Apophysomyces
burn
cutaneous
qPCR
outbreak
molecular typing
environmental source
nosocomial
Saksenaea
Apophysomyces
HAL domain(s) :
Sciences du Vivant [q-bio]
English abstract : [en]
Patients with extensive burns are an important group at risk for cutaneous mucormycosis. This study aimed to perform a systematic review of all reported mucormycosis cases in burn patients from 1990 onward. A Medline search ...
Show more >Patients with extensive burns are an important group at risk for cutaneous mucormycosis. This study aimed to perform a systematic review of all reported mucormycosis cases in burn patients from 1990 onward. A Medline search yielded identification of 7 case series, 3 outbreaks, and 25 individual cases reports. The prevalence reached 0.04%–0.6%. The median age was 42–48 in the case series and outbreaks, except for the studies from military centers (23.5–32.5) and in individual reports (29.5). The median total body surface area reached 42.5%–65%. Various skin lesions were described, none being pathognomonic: the diagnosis was mainly reached because of extensive necrotic lesions sometimes associated with sepsis. Most patients were treated with systemic amphotericin B or liposomal amphotericin B, and all underwent debridement and/or amputation. Mortality reached 33%–100% in the case series, 29%–62% during outbreaks, and 40% in individual cases. Most patients were diagnosed using histopathology and/or culture. Mucorales qPCR showed detection of circulating DNA 2–24 days before the standard diagnosis. Species included the main clinically relevant mucorales (i.e., Mucor, Rhizopus, Absidia/Lichtheimia, Rhizomucor) but also more uncommon mucorales such as Saksenaea or Apophysomyces. Contact with soil was reported in most individual cases. Bandages were identified as the source of contamination in two nosocomial outbreaks.Show less >
Show more >Patients with extensive burns are an important group at risk for cutaneous mucormycosis. This study aimed to perform a systematic review of all reported mucormycosis cases in burn patients from 1990 onward. A Medline search yielded identification of 7 case series, 3 outbreaks, and 25 individual cases reports. The prevalence reached 0.04%–0.6%. The median age was 42–48 in the case series and outbreaks, except for the studies from military centers (23.5–32.5) and in individual reports (29.5). The median total body surface area reached 42.5%–65%. Various skin lesions were described, none being pathognomonic: the diagnosis was mainly reached because of extensive necrotic lesions sometimes associated with sepsis. Most patients were treated with systemic amphotericin B or liposomal amphotericin B, and all underwent debridement and/or amputation. Mortality reached 33%–100% in the case series, 29%–62% during outbreaks, and 40% in individual cases. Most patients were diagnosed using histopathology and/or culture. Mucorales qPCR showed detection of circulating DNA 2–24 days before the standard diagnosis. Species included the main clinically relevant mucorales (i.e., Mucor, Rhizopus, Absidia/Lichtheimia, Rhizomucor) but also more uncommon mucorales such as Saksenaea or Apophysomyces. Contact with soil was reported in most individual cases. Bandages were identified as the source of contamination in two nosocomial outbreaks.Show less >
Language :
Anglais
Audience :
Internationale
Popular science :
Non
Administrative institution(s) :
Université de Lille
CHU Lille
CHU Lille
Submission date :
2023-05-25T03:51:01Z
2023-09-08T14:34:51Z
2023-09-08T14:34:51Z
Files
- Mucormycosis in Burn Patients.pdf
- Version éditeur
- Open access
- Access the document