How to select proper interdental brush ...
Document type :
Article dans une revue scientifique: Article original
PMID :
Permalink :
Title :
How to select proper interdental brush size in periodontitis patients: Comparison of the reliability of two methods among novice and expert users.
Author(s) :
Petit, J. [Auteur]
Huon, C. [Auteur]
Nicolas, T. [Auteur]
Sy, Kadiatou [Auteur]
Advanced Drug Delivery Systems (ADDS) - U1008
Dubar, M. [Auteur]
Agossa, Kevimy [Auteur]
Advanced Drug Delivery Systems (ADDS) - U1008
Huon, C. [Auteur]
Nicolas, T. [Auteur]
Sy, Kadiatou [Auteur]

Advanced Drug Delivery Systems (ADDS) - U1008
Dubar, M. [Auteur]
Agossa, Kevimy [Auteur]

Advanced Drug Delivery Systems (ADDS) - U1008
Journal title :
American Journal of Dentistry
Volume number :
34
Pages :
186-189
Publication date :
2021-08-13
ISSN :
0894-8275
HAL domain(s) :
Sciences du Vivant [q-bio]
English abstract : [en]
Purpose: To compare two methods used by novice and expert operators for selecting interdental brush (IDB) size for periodontitis patients: (1) sequential testing or (2) using a color-coded taper tip device (CTD) corresponding ...
Show more >Purpose: To compare two methods used by novice and expert operators for selecting interdental brush (IDB) size for periodontitis patients: (1) sequential testing or (2) using a color-coded taper tip device (CTD) corresponding to color-coded brush sizes. Methods: Six operators, one experienced and five dental students, employed both methods to determine the IDB with best fit for 204 interdental spaces in 34 periodontitis patients. The percentage of agreement and the inter-methods reliability was evaluated. The influence of anatomical features on differences between the operators or method was also investigated. Results: Moderate to substantial correlation was found between the two methods but the reliability was stronger when different operators used the same method, irrespective of the method, than when they used a different method. Among the anatomical factors studied, only sites in molar regions were associated with significant differences. Clinical significance: Use of a dedicated color-coded taper tip may be an alternative to the fastidious sequential testing of different IDB in selecting best-fit IDB diameter for periodontal patients with moderate to broad interdental spaces.Show less >
Show more >Purpose: To compare two methods used by novice and expert operators for selecting interdental brush (IDB) size for periodontitis patients: (1) sequential testing or (2) using a color-coded taper tip device (CTD) corresponding to color-coded brush sizes. Methods: Six operators, one experienced and five dental students, employed both methods to determine the IDB with best fit for 204 interdental spaces in 34 periodontitis patients. The percentage of agreement and the inter-methods reliability was evaluated. The influence of anatomical features on differences between the operators or method was also investigated. Results: Moderate to substantial correlation was found between the two methods but the reliability was stronger when different operators used the same method, irrespective of the method, than when they used a different method. Among the anatomical factors studied, only sites in molar regions were associated with significant differences. Clinical significance: Use of a dedicated color-coded taper tip may be an alternative to the fastidious sequential testing of different IDB in selecting best-fit IDB diameter for periodontal patients with moderate to broad interdental spaces.Show less >
Language :
Anglais
Audience :
Non spécifiée
Administrative institution(s) :
Université de Lille
Inserm
CHU Lille
Inserm
CHU Lille
Collections :
Submission date :
2023-05-30T07:01:39Z
2023-09-01T12:14:42Z
2023-09-01T12:14:42Z