Resisting from the bench: an overview of ...
Type de document :
Partie d'ouvrage: Chapitre
URL permanente :
Titre :
Resisting from the bench: an overview of French and UK courts jurisprudence on unilateral and extraterritorial sanctions
Auteur(s) :
Éditeur(s) ou directeur(s) scientifique(s) :
Beaucillon, Charlotte
Titre de l’ouvrage :
Research Handbook on Unilateral and Extraterritorial Sanctions
Pagination :
306-322
Éditeur :
Edward Elgar Publishing
Lieu de publication :
Cheltenham
Date de publication :
2021-08-17
ISBN :
978-1-83910-785-6
Discipline(s) HAL :
Sciences de l'Homme et Société/Droit
Résumé en anglais : [en]
This chapter explores the defence options available to economic operators in France and the UK against unilateral and extraterritorial sanctions, including unilateral sanctions issued by these two countries. It compares ...
Lire la suite >This chapter explores the defence options available to economic operators in France and the UK against unilateral and extraterritorial sanctions, including unilateral sanctions issued by these two countries. It compares French and UK case law, exploring how courts respond to the development of unilateral sanctions. National judges have had the opportunity to rule on the application of blocking statutes and on the effects of these sanctions on contracts. In the absence of strong legislative instruments on which to base their decisions, courts and tribunals have had to be inventive in containing the effects of extraterritorial sanctions. This chapter highlights the low impact of blocking statutes and raises the question of the legality and scope of sanctions clauses. The contribution shows that a common core of procedural principles and fundamental rights is developing in national and European courts, even if they are not necessarily applied in the same way.Lire moins >
Lire la suite >This chapter explores the defence options available to economic operators in France and the UK against unilateral and extraterritorial sanctions, including unilateral sanctions issued by these two countries. It compares French and UK case law, exploring how courts respond to the development of unilateral sanctions. National judges have had the opportunity to rule on the application of blocking statutes and on the effects of these sanctions on contracts. In the absence of strong legislative instruments on which to base their decisions, courts and tribunals have had to be inventive in containing the effects of extraterritorial sanctions. This chapter highlights the low impact of blocking statutes and raises the question of the legality and scope of sanctions clauses. The contribution shows that a common core of procedural principles and fundamental rights is developing in national and European courts, even if they are not necessarily applied in the same way.Lire moins >
Langue :
Anglais
Audience :
Internationale
Vulgarisation :
Non
Établissement(s) :
Université de Lille
Équipe(s) de recherche :
L’Équipe René Demogue
Date de dépôt :
2021-09-09T10:00:04Z
2021-09-09T12:12:07Z
2021-09-09T12:12:07Z