Does the choice of a modern formal logic ...
Document type :
Autre communication scientifique (congrès sans actes - poster - séminaire...): Communication dans un congrès avec actes
Title :
Does the choice of a modern formal logic influence the interpretation of Aristotle’s syllogistic? A study of Kurt Ebbinghaus’ answer
Author(s) :
McConaughey, Zoé [Auteur]
Université de Lille - Faculté des Humanités [UL Humanités]
Savoirs, Textes, Langage (STL) - UMR 8163 [STL]
Université de Lille - Faculté des Humanités [UL Humanités]
Savoirs, Textes, Langage (STL) - UMR 8163 [STL]
Conference title :
Aristotle’s Organon in old and new logic, c. 1800–1950
Conference organizers(s) :
Gerald Hartung
Colin Guthrie King
Venanzio Raspa
Colin Guthrie King
Venanzio Raspa
City :
Villa Vigoni, Menaggio (Como)
Country :
Italie
Start date of the conference :
2022-03-10
HAL domain(s) :
Sciences de l'Homme et Société/Philosophie
Mathématiques [math]/Logique [math.LO]
Mathématiques [math]/Logique [math.LO]
English abstract : [en]
In 1964, Ebbinghaus published Ein formales Modell der Syllogistik des Aristoteles in which he provides a formalization of Aristotle’s assertoric syllogistic using the Operationist logic of Lorenzen (1955). My main focus ...
Show more >In 1964, Ebbinghaus published Ein formales Modell der Syllogistik des Aristoteles in which he provides a formalization of Aristotle’s assertoric syllogistic using the Operationist logic of Lorenzen (1955). My main focus will be on the methodological considerations Ebbinghaus develops throughout his study: he was very self-conscious of his role as interpreter of Aristotle’s logic and was well aware of the fact that, when developing a formal reconstruction of Aristotle’s syllogistic, the choice of logical framework, such as the Operationist logic, was taking a stance in the contemporary debate on the foundations of logic, de facto arguing in favor of the chosen framework. In this regard, Ebbinghaus considered his formal reconstruction as a way of better understanding Aristotle’s logic and as defending Lorenzen’s Operationist logic. By focusing on Ebbinghaus’ study, I wish to question how much modern formal logics influence the interpretation of an ancient logic, and, in this case, of Aristotle’s assertoric syllogistic.ReferencesEbbinghaus, Kurt (1964). Ein formales Modell der Syllogistik des Aristoteles. Vol. 9. Hypomnemata, Untersuchungen zur Antike und zu ihrem Nachleben. Göttingen, Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Lorenzen, Paul (1955). Einführung in die operative Logik und Mathematik. Berlin: Springer.Show less >
Show more >In 1964, Ebbinghaus published Ein formales Modell der Syllogistik des Aristoteles in which he provides a formalization of Aristotle’s assertoric syllogistic using the Operationist logic of Lorenzen (1955). My main focus will be on the methodological considerations Ebbinghaus develops throughout his study: he was very self-conscious of his role as interpreter of Aristotle’s logic and was well aware of the fact that, when developing a formal reconstruction of Aristotle’s syllogistic, the choice of logical framework, such as the Operationist logic, was taking a stance in the contemporary debate on the foundations of logic, de facto arguing in favor of the chosen framework. In this regard, Ebbinghaus considered his formal reconstruction as a way of better understanding Aristotle’s logic and as defending Lorenzen’s Operationist logic. By focusing on Ebbinghaus’ study, I wish to question how much modern formal logics influence the interpretation of an ancient logic, and, in this case, of Aristotle’s assertoric syllogistic.ReferencesEbbinghaus, Kurt (1964). Ein formales Modell der Syllogistik des Aristoteles. Vol. 9. Hypomnemata, Untersuchungen zur Antike und zu ihrem Nachleben. Göttingen, Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Lorenzen, Paul (1955). Einführung in die operative Logik und Mathematik. Berlin: Springer.Show less >
Language :
Anglais
Peer reviewed article :
Oui
Audience :
Internationale
Popular science :
Non
Collections :
Source :