Titre :

Refutazioni egologiche e questionari heideggeriani.
Brentano e le aporie dell’‘io sono’ trafilosofia trascendentale e metafisica

Auteur(s) :

Majolino, Claudio [Auteur]
Savoirs, Textes, Langage (STL) - UMR 8163 [STL]

Titre de la revue :

Alvearium

Pagination :

145-182

Éditeur :

Centro dipartementale di studi su Descartes "Ettore Lojacono"

Date de publication :

2022

ISSN :

2036-5020

Mot(s)-clé(s) en anglais :

Brentano
Heidegger
Descartes
Aristotle
ego
cogito
skepticism
transcendental philosophy
metaphysics

Discipline(s) HAL :

Sciences de l'Homme et Société/Philosophie

Résumé en anglais : [en]

In Being and Time, Heidegger presents the whole of post-Cartesian metaphysics as incapable of explicitly adressingthe questionof being as such. He thus describes modern metaphysics as implicitly bound to the quite traditional ...
Lire la suite >In Being and Time, Heidegger presents the whole of post-Cartesian metaphysics as incapable of explicitly adressingthe questionof being as such. He thus describes modern metaphysics as implicitly bound to the quite traditional sense of being as presence, applyed it to the being of the ego cogito now understood as a fundamentum inconcussum. For his part, in his lectures on Metaphysics, Brentano, not unlike Descartes, inends to take up the Aristotelian science of being as such based on the evidence measured by the cogitationes that appear to internal perception. By doing so he thus examines the relationship between ‘ego’ and ‘sum’ on the background of a wide array of skeptical objections. But what then does ego sum mean? More importantly, how far does the analogy between Brentano and Descartes (for whom the ego sum is actually a fundamentum inconcussum) actually go? Finally, in Brentano, is the sense of ‘sum’ relative to such a ‘cogito’ really so implicit? And can it be said that such a sense fully corresponds to the sense of being as being present? Through a detailed reconstruction of the Brentanian argumentsadvanced in his lectures on Metaphysics, we will try to test the limits of Heidegger’s diagnosis of modern metaphysics by asking if and to what extent it actually clarifies the nature of Brentano’s project or, instead, conceals some of its most original aspects.Lire moins >

Langue :

Italien

Vulgarisation :

Non

Collections :

• Savoirs, Textes, Langage (STL) - UMR 8163

Source :

Harvested from HAL