Dialogical syllogistic

McConaughey, Zoé

Type de document :

Autre communication scientifique (congrès sans actes - poster - séminaire...): Communication dans un congrès avec actes

Titre :

Dialogical syllogistic

Auteur(s) :

McConaughey, Zoé [Auteur]

Savoirs, Textes, Langage (STL) - UMR 8163 [STL]
Université de Lille - Faculté des Humanités [UL Humanités]

Titre de la manifestation scientifique :

PhD Colloquium

Organisateur(s) de la manifestation scientifique :

DVMLG

Ville :

Konstanz Universität

Pays :

Allemagne

Date de début de la manifestation scientifique :

2022-09-26

Discipline(s) HAL :

Sciences de l'Homme et Société/Philosophie
Mathématiques [math]/Logique [math.LO]

Résumé en anglais : [en]

My PhD dissertation “Aristotle, science and the dialectician’s activity. A dialogical approach to Aristotle’s logic” defends the thesis that Aristotle’s logic is best understood from a dialogical perspective. I will here ...
Lire la suite >My PhD dissertation “Aristotle, science and the dialectician’s activity. A dialogical approach to Aristotle’s logic” defends the thesis that Aristotle’s logic is best understood from a dialogical perspective. I will here be presenting the formal part of my dissertation in which I provide a full formal reconstruction of Aristotle’s assertoric syllogistic using the modern, formal framework of “dialogical logic” (first developed by Paul Lorenzen and Kuno Lorenz). I thus present a pragmatic, interaction-based reconstruction of all of Aristotle’s assertoric syllogistic, encompassing the three figures of the syllogism, ecthesis, direct and indirect deductions, reductions to the first figure, as well as the inconclusive moods. All of Aristotle’s syllogistic is thus reconstructed using “dialogical logic”.The dialogical framework explicits the dialogical context of the practice of dialectical debates which underlies Aristotle’s logic as a whole and which has been stressed by modern scholars such as Michel Crubellier. What is more, in order to achieve the formal reconstruction, I use the variant of the dialogical framework called “Immanent Reasoning” (Rahman, McConaughey, Clerbout, Klev 2018) which incorporates notation from Per Martin-Löf’s Type Theory. All of syllogistic can thus be built out of Aristotle’s meaning explanation of quantification spelled out in the “dictum de omni” (APr. I 1), a bridge between the syllogistic of the Prior Analytics and the dialectic of the Topics (Marion & Rückert 2016). Aristotelian scholarship and modern logical tools are thus combined to express all of Aristotle’s assertoric syllogistic in a dialogical framework.References: • Lorenzen, Paul and Kuno Lorenz, 1978, Dialogische Logik, Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft. • Crubellier, Michel, 2011, “Du Sullogismos au syllogisme”, Revue philosophique de la France et de l'étranger, 136(1): 17–36 • Marion, Mathieu and Helge Rückert, 2016, “Aristotle on Universal Quantification: A Study from the Point of View of Game Semantics”, History and Philosophy of Logic, 37(3): 201–229. doi:10.1080/01445340.2015.1089043 • Martin-Löf, Per, 1984, Intuitionistic Type Theory. Notes by Giovanni Sambin of a Series of Lectures given in Padua, June 1980, Naples: Bibliopolis. • Rahman, Shahid, Zoe McConaughey, Ansten Klev, and Nicolas Clerbout, 2018, Immanent Reasoning or Equality in Action: A Plaidoyer for the Play Level, (Logic, Argumentation & Reasoning 18), Cham: Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-91149-6Lire moins >

Langue :

Anglais

Comité de lecture :

Oui

Audience :

Internationale

Vulgarisation :

Non

Collections :

Savoirs, Textes, Langage (STL) - UMR 8163

Source :

Harvested from HAL

Dialogical syllogistic BibTeX CSV Excel RIS

Dialogical syllogistic

BibTeX

CSV

Excel

RIS