Assessing the acceptability of technological ...
Type de document :
Article dans une revue scientifique: Article de synthèse/Review paper
URL permanente :
Titre :
Assessing the acceptability of technological health innovations in sub‑Saharan Africa: a scoping review and a best fit framework synthesis
Auteur(s) :
Louart, Sarah [Auteur]
Alliance for International medical Action [ALIMA]
Centre Lillois d’Études et de Recherches Sociologiques et Économiques - UMR 8019 [CLERSÉ]
Hedible, Gildas Boris [Auteur]
Centre d'Epidémiologie et de Recherche en santé des POPulations [CERPOP]
Ridde, Valery [Auteur]
Université Cheikh Anta Diop de Dakar [Sénégal] [UCAD]
Centre population et développement [CEPED - UMR_D 196]
Alliance for International medical Action [ALIMA]
Centre Lillois d’Études et de Recherches Sociologiques et Économiques - UMR 8019 [CLERSÉ]
Hedible, Gildas Boris [Auteur]
Centre d'Epidémiologie et de Recherche en santé des POPulations [CERPOP]
Ridde, Valery [Auteur]
Université Cheikh Anta Diop de Dakar [Sénégal] [UCAD]
Centre population et développement [CEPED - UMR_D 196]
Titre de la revue :
BMC Health Services Research
Numéro :
23
Date de publication :
2023-08-31
Discipline(s) HAL :
Sciences de l'Homme et Société/Economies et finances
Résumé en anglais : [en]
Acceptability is a key concept used to analyze the introduction of a health innovation in a specific setting. However, there seems to be a lack of clarity in this notion, both conceptually and practically. In low and ...
Lire la suite >Acceptability is a key concept used to analyze the introduction of a health innovation in a specific setting. However, there seems to be a lack of clarity in this notion, both conceptually and practically. In low and middle-income countries, programs to support the diffusion of new technological tools are multiplying. They face challenges and difficulties that need to be understood with an in-depth analysis of the acceptability of these innovations. We performed a scoping review to explore the theories, methods and conceptual frameworks that have been used to measure and understand the acceptability of technological health innovations in sub-Saharan Africa. The review confirmed the lack of common definitions, conceptualizations and practical tools addressing the acceptability of health innovations. To synthesize and combine evidence, both theoretically and empirically, we then used the "best fit framework synthesis" method. Based on five conceptual and theoretical frameworks from scientific literature and evidence from 33 empirical studies, we built a conceptual framework in order to understand the acceptability of technological health innovations. This framework comprises 6 determinants (compatibility, social influence, personal emotions, perceived disadvantages, perceived advantages and perceived complexity) and two moderating factors (intervention and context). This knowledge synthesis work has also enabled us to propose a chronology of the different stages of acceptability.Lire moins >
Lire la suite >Acceptability is a key concept used to analyze the introduction of a health innovation in a specific setting. However, there seems to be a lack of clarity in this notion, both conceptually and practically. In low and middle-income countries, programs to support the diffusion of new technological tools are multiplying. They face challenges and difficulties that need to be understood with an in-depth analysis of the acceptability of these innovations. We performed a scoping review to explore the theories, methods and conceptual frameworks that have been used to measure and understand the acceptability of technological health innovations in sub-Saharan Africa. The review confirmed the lack of common definitions, conceptualizations and practical tools addressing the acceptability of health innovations. To synthesize and combine evidence, both theoretically and empirically, we then used the "best fit framework synthesis" method. Based on five conceptual and theoretical frameworks from scientific literature and evidence from 33 empirical studies, we built a conceptual framework in order to understand the acceptability of technological health innovations. This framework comprises 6 determinants (compatibility, social influence, personal emotions, perceived disadvantages, perceived advantages and perceived complexity) and two moderating factors (intervention and context). This knowledge synthesis work has also enabled us to propose a chronology of the different stages of acceptability.Lire moins >
Langue :
Anglais
Comité de lecture :
Oui
Audience :
Internationale
Vulgarisation :
Non
Établissement(s) :
Université de Lille
CNRS
Univ. Littoral Côte d’Opale
CNRS
Univ. Littoral Côte d’Opale
Collections :
Équipe(s) de recherche :
Économies et sociétés : développement, richesse, innovation et régulation
Date de dépôt :
2024-01-30T10:30:21Z
2024-01-31T09:39:33Z
2024-01-31T09:39:33Z
Fichiers
- acceptabilite SR + BFFS.pdf
- Version éditeur
- Accès libre
- Accéder au document