Middle Paleolithic bone retouchers from ...
Document type :
Autre communication scientifique (congrès sans actes - poster - séminaire...): Communication dans un congrès avec actes
Title :
Middle Paleolithic bone retouchers from Northern France: preliminary results of a multi-proxy analysis
Author(s) :
Vignes, Marie-Pauline [Auteur]
Évolution, Écologie et Paléontologie (Evo-Eco-Paleo) - UMR 8198 [Evo-Eco-Paléo (EEP)]
Bray, Fabrice [Auteur]
Miniaturisation pour la Synthèse, l’Analyse et la Protéomique - UAR 3290 [MSAP]
Rots, Veerle [Auteur]
Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique [FNRS]
TraceoLab
Julien, Marie-Anne [Auteur]
Histoire naturelle de l'Homme préhistorique [HNHP]
GeoArchEon SARL
Auguste, Patrick [Auteur]
Évolution, Écologie et Paléontologie (Evo-Eco-Paleo) - UMR 8198 [Evo-Eco-Paléo (EEP)]
Évolution, Écologie et Paléontologie (Evo-Eco-Paleo) - UMR 8198 [Evo-Eco-Paléo (EEP)]
Bray, Fabrice [Auteur]
Miniaturisation pour la Synthèse, l’Analyse et la Protéomique - UAR 3290 [MSAP]
Rots, Veerle [Auteur]
Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique [FNRS]
TraceoLab
Julien, Marie-Anne [Auteur]
Histoire naturelle de l'Homme préhistorique [HNHP]
GeoArchEon SARL
Auguste, Patrick [Auteur]
Évolution, Écologie et Paléontologie (Evo-Eco-Paleo) - UMR 8198 [Evo-Eco-Paléo (EEP)]
Conference title :
XXe Congrès mondial de l'Union Internationale des Sciences Préhistoriques et Protohistoriques
Conference organizers(s) :
UISPP
City :
Timisoara
Country :
Roumanie
Start date of the conference :
2023-09-05
English keyword(s) :
Neandertal
bone tools
Zooarchaeology
paleoproteomics
Experimentation
bone tools
Zooarchaeology
paleoproteomics
Experimentation
HAL domain(s) :
Sciences de l'Homme et Société/Archéologie et Préhistoire
Sciences du Vivant [q-bio]/Biochimie, Biologie Moléculaire/Génomique, Transcriptomique et Protéomique [q-bio.GN]
Sciences du Vivant [q-bio]/Biochimie, Biologie Moléculaire/Génomique, Transcriptomique et Protéomique [q-bio.GN]
English abstract : [en]
Over the last decades, important discoveries have deeply reshaped our understanding of Neanderthal behaviors, and notably an increasing number of proofs of non-dietary uses of different kind of animals. The use of bones ...
Show more >Over the last decades, important discoveries have deeply reshaped our understanding of Neanderthal behaviors, and notably an increasing number of proofs of non-dietary uses of different kind of animals. The use of bones for a variety of daily activities is now frequently identified, with so-called bone “retouchers” being the most recognizable and the most numerous. But weather those remains were opportunistically or deliberately chosen remains unclear, highlighting two key questions: was there any intentionality in the choice of raw material? Was there any specific preparation of the bones prior their use as retouchers? Only a multi-proxy analysis can allow to answer those questions. We will present here our approach and preliminary results through the study of a collection from Northern France: Biache-Saint-Vaast (thereafter BSV).The MIS 7 site of BSV yielded three main archaeological levels with Mousterian lithic industries associated with rich bones of large terrestrial mammals remains, with particularly good surface preservation for an open-air site. Over 300 bone remains with impression patches, similar to percussion stigmata on lithic material were identified, making BSV one of the largest known collections of Middle Paleolithic bone tools. We propose to perform a systematic non-invasive zooarchaeological, taphonomical and use-wear study to understand the acquisition and use of the remains. In addition, paleoproteomics analyses are applied to overcome the limitations of classical taxonomic attributions, through a minimally invasive technique.Our first results indicate that the remains of the three main species identified at BSV were used as "retouchers": aurochs (Bos primigenius), brown bear (Ursus arctos) and meadow rhinoceros (Stephanorhinus hemitoechus). The specimen observed so far were nearly exclusively used for percussion of flint, in order to retouch flakes or tools. These results highlight the importance of combining different approaches and methods for the knowledge of the use of such bone tools and more generally of the management of large fauna by Neanderthal populations. Further analyses will attempt to characterize the full bone tool collection of BSV. In addition, Middle Paleolithic sites from Northern France where bones are well preserved, will allow the application of such multi-proxy analysis at a large scale.Such detailed studies, using multi-proxy approaches on bone tools, is still poorly developed among Middle Paleolithic researches and will undoubtedly become mandatory to improve our knowledge of past huntersShow less >
Show more >Over the last decades, important discoveries have deeply reshaped our understanding of Neanderthal behaviors, and notably an increasing number of proofs of non-dietary uses of different kind of animals. The use of bones for a variety of daily activities is now frequently identified, with so-called bone “retouchers” being the most recognizable and the most numerous. But weather those remains were opportunistically or deliberately chosen remains unclear, highlighting two key questions: was there any intentionality in the choice of raw material? Was there any specific preparation of the bones prior their use as retouchers? Only a multi-proxy analysis can allow to answer those questions. We will present here our approach and preliminary results through the study of a collection from Northern France: Biache-Saint-Vaast (thereafter BSV).The MIS 7 site of BSV yielded three main archaeological levels with Mousterian lithic industries associated with rich bones of large terrestrial mammals remains, with particularly good surface preservation for an open-air site. Over 300 bone remains with impression patches, similar to percussion stigmata on lithic material were identified, making BSV one of the largest known collections of Middle Paleolithic bone tools. We propose to perform a systematic non-invasive zooarchaeological, taphonomical and use-wear study to understand the acquisition and use of the remains. In addition, paleoproteomics analyses are applied to overcome the limitations of classical taxonomic attributions, through a minimally invasive technique.Our first results indicate that the remains of the three main species identified at BSV were used as "retouchers": aurochs (Bos primigenius), brown bear (Ursus arctos) and meadow rhinoceros (Stephanorhinus hemitoechus). The specimen observed so far were nearly exclusively used for percussion of flint, in order to retouch flakes or tools. These results highlight the importance of combining different approaches and methods for the knowledge of the use of such bone tools and more generally of the management of large fauna by Neanderthal populations. Further analyses will attempt to characterize the full bone tool collection of BSV. In addition, Middle Paleolithic sites from Northern France where bones are well preserved, will allow the application of such multi-proxy analysis at a large scale.Such detailed studies, using multi-proxy approaches on bone tools, is still poorly developed among Middle Paleolithic researches and will undoubtedly become mandatory to improve our knowledge of past huntersShow less >
Language :
Anglais
Peer reviewed article :
Oui
Audience :
Internationale
Popular science :
Non
Source :
Files
- UISPP_09_2023_resume_MPVignes.pdf
- Open access
- Access the document