Supercritical fluid chromatography versus ...
Document type :
Article dans une revue scientifique
PMID :
Permalink :
Title :
Supercritical fluid chromatography versus high performance liquid chromatography for enantiomeric and diastereoisomeric separations on coated polysaccharides-based stationary phases: Application to dihydropyridone derivatives.
Author(s) :
Hoguet, Vanessa [Auteur]
Médicaments et molécules pour les systèmes vivants - U 1177 [M2SV]
Charton, Julie [Auteur]
Médicaments et molécules pour les systèmes vivants - U 1177 [M2SV]
Hecquet, Paul-Emile [Auteur]
Lille Inflammation Research International Center - U 995 [LIRIC]
Lakhmi, Chahinaze [Auteur]
Lille Inflammation Research International Center - U 995 [LIRIC]
Lipka, Emmanuelle [Auteur]
Lille Inflammation Research International Center - U 995 [LIRIC]
Médicaments et molécules pour les systèmes vivants - U 1177 [M2SV]
Charton, Julie [Auteur]

Médicaments et molécules pour les systèmes vivants - U 1177 [M2SV]
Hecquet, Paul-Emile [Auteur]
Lille Inflammation Research International Center - U 995 [LIRIC]
Lakhmi, Chahinaze [Auteur]
Lille Inflammation Research International Center - U 995 [LIRIC]
Lipka, Emmanuelle [Auteur]

Lille Inflammation Research International Center - U 995 [LIRIC]
Journal title :
Journal of Chromatography A
Abbreviated title :
J. Chromatogr. A
Volume number :
1549
Pages :
39-50
Publication date :
2018-05-11
ISSN :
1873-3778
English keyword(s) :
Chiral separation
Dihydropyridone derivatives
Semi-preparative chromatography
Amylose tris (3,5-dimethylphenylcarbamate)
Cellulose tris (3,5-dimethylphenylcarbamate)
Dihydropyridone derivatives
Semi-preparative chromatography
Amylose tris (3,5-dimethylphenylcarbamate)
Cellulose tris (3,5-dimethylphenylcarbamate)
HAL domain(s) :
Sciences du Vivant [q-bio]
English abstract : [en]
For analytical applications, SFC has always remained in the shadow of LC. Analytical enantioseparation of eight dihydropyridone derivatives, was run in both High Performance Liquid Chromatography and Supercritical Fluid ...
Show more >For analytical applications, SFC has always remained in the shadow of LC. Analytical enantioseparation of eight dihydropyridone derivatives, was run in both High Performance Liquid Chromatography and Supercritical Fluid Chromatography. Four polysaccharide based chiral stationary phases namely amylose and cellulose tris(3, 5-dimethylphenylcarbamate), amylose tris((S)-α-phenylethylcarbamate) and cellulose tris(4-methylbenzoate) with four mobile phases consisted of either n-hexane/ethanol or propan-2-ol (80:20 v:v) or carbon dioxide/ethanol or propan-2-ol (80:20 v:v) mixtures were investigated under same operatory conditions (temperature and flow-rate). The elution strength, enantioselectivity and resolution were compared in the two methodologies. For these compounds, for most of the conditions, HPLC afforded shorter retention times and a higher resolution than SFC. HPLC appears particularly suitable for the separation of the compounds bearing two chiral centers. For instance compound 7 was baseline resolved on OD-H CSP under n-Hex/EtOH 80/20, with resolution values equal to 2.98, 1.55, 4.52, between the four stereoisomers in less than 17 min, whereas in SFC, this latter is not fully separated in 23 min under similar eluting conditions. After analytical screenings, the best conditions were transposed to semi-preparative scale.Show less >
Show more >For analytical applications, SFC has always remained in the shadow of LC. Analytical enantioseparation of eight dihydropyridone derivatives, was run in both High Performance Liquid Chromatography and Supercritical Fluid Chromatography. Four polysaccharide based chiral stationary phases namely amylose and cellulose tris(3, 5-dimethylphenylcarbamate), amylose tris((S)-α-phenylethylcarbamate) and cellulose tris(4-methylbenzoate) with four mobile phases consisted of either n-hexane/ethanol or propan-2-ol (80:20 v:v) or carbon dioxide/ethanol or propan-2-ol (80:20 v:v) mixtures were investigated under same operatory conditions (temperature and flow-rate). The elution strength, enantioselectivity and resolution were compared in the two methodologies. For these compounds, for most of the conditions, HPLC afforded shorter retention times and a higher resolution than SFC. HPLC appears particularly suitable for the separation of the compounds bearing two chiral centers. For instance compound 7 was baseline resolved on OD-H CSP under n-Hex/EtOH 80/20, with resolution values equal to 2.98, 1.55, 4.52, between the four stereoisomers in less than 17 min, whereas in SFC, this latter is not fully separated in 23 min under similar eluting conditions. After analytical screenings, the best conditions were transposed to semi-preparative scale.Show less >
Audience :
Internationale
Popular science :
Non
Administrative institution(s) :
CHU Lille
Université de Lille
Inserm
Université de Lille
Inserm
Collections :
Research team(s) :
Therapeutic innovation targetting inflammation
Submission date :
2019-05-17T13:14:45Z
2021-06-10T15:39:39Z
2023-12-04T15:11:40Z
2021-06-10T15:39:39Z
2023-12-04T15:11:40Z