Additive manufacturing of fire‐retardant ethylene‐vinyl acetate

Geoffroy, Laura; Samyn, Fabienne; Jimenez, Maude; Bourbigot, Serge

Type de document :

Article dans une revue scientifique

DOI :

10.1002/pat.4620

URL permanente :

http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12210/11475

Titre :

Additive manufacturing of fire‐retardant ethylene‐vinyl acetate

Auteur(s) :

Geoffroy, Laura [Auteur]
Unité Matériaux et Transformations - UMR 8207 [UMET]
Samyn, Fabienne [Auteur]

Unité Matériaux et Transformations - UMR 8207 [UMET]
Jimenez, Maude [Auteur]

Unité Matériaux et Transformations (UMET) - UMR 8207
Unité Matériaux et Transformations - UMR 8207 [UMET]
Bourbigot, Serge [Auteur]

Unité Matériaux et Transformations - UMR 8207 [UMET]

Titre de la revue :

Polymers for Advanced Technologies

Nom court de la revue :

Polym Adv Technol

Éditeur :

Wiley

Date de publication :

2019-04-17

Discipline(s) HAL :

Chimie/Polymères
Chimie/Matériaux

Résumé en anglais : [en]

Thermocompression (with also extrusion and injection molding) is a classical polymer shaping manufacturing, but it does not easily allow designing sophisticated shapes without using a complex mold, on the contrary to 3D ...
Lire la suite >Thermocompression (with also extrusion and injection molding) is a classical polymer shaping manufacturing, but it does not easily allow designing sophisticated shapes without using a complex mold, on the contrary to 3D printing (or polymer additive manufacturing), which is a very flexible technique. Among all 3D printing techniques, fused deposition modeling is of high potential for product manufacturing, with the capability to compete with conventional polymer processing techniques. This is a quite low cost 3D printing technique, but the range of filaments commercially available is limited. However, in some specific 3D printing processes, no filaments are necessary. Polymers pellets feed directly the printing nozzle allowing to investigate many polymeric matrices with no commercial limitation. This is of high interest for the design of flame-retarded materials, but literature is scarce in that field. In this paper, a comparison between thermocompression and 3D printing processes was performed on both neat ethylene-vinyl acetate (EVA) copolymer and EVA flame retarded with aluminum triHydroxyde (ATH) containing different loadings (30 or 65 wt%) and with expandable graphite (EG), ie, EVA/ATH (30 wt%), EVA/ATH (65 wt%), and EVA/EG (10 wt%), respectively. Morphological comparisons, using microscopic and electronic microprobe analyses, revealed that 3D printed plates have lower apparent density and higher porosity than thermocompressed plate. The fire-retardant properties of thermocompressed and 3D printed plates were then evaluated using mass loss calorimeter test at 50 kW/m2. Results highlight that 3D printing can be used to produce flame-retardant systems. This work is a pioneer study exploring the feasibility of using polymer additive manufacturing technology for designing efficient flame-retarded materials.Lire moins >

Langue :

Anglais

Audience :

Non spécifiée

Projet Européen :

MULTI-CONCEPTUAL DESIGN OF FIRE BARRIER: A SYSTEMIC APPROACH

Collections :

Unité Matériaux et Transformations (UMET) - UMR 8207

Équipe(s) de recherche :

Ingénierie des Systèmes Polymères

Date de dépôt :

2019-06-11T08:05:05Z
2019-06-26T07:12:40Z

Fichiers

PAT 2019 -Thermocompression vs 3D printing FR (corrected).pdf
Version soumise (preprint)
Accès libre
Accéder au document

Numéro de version	Lien	Date de modification
2	20.500.12210/11475*	2019-06-26T07:07:01Z
1	20.500.12210/11475.1	2019-06-11T08:05:05Z

Additive manufacturing of fire‐retardant ...

BibTeX

CSV

Excel

RIS

Fichiers

Historique des modifications

Additive manufacturing of fire‐retardant ... BibTeX CSV Excel RIS

Fichiers

Historique des modifications

Additive manufacturing of fire‐retardant ...

BibTeX

CSV

Excel

RIS