Use of genotypic HIV DNA testing: a ...
Type de document :
Article dans une revue scientifique: Article original
DOI :
PMID :
URL permanente :
Titre :
Use of genotypic HIV DNA testing: a DELPHI-type consensus
Auteur(s) :
Andre-Garnier, Elisabeth [Auteur]
Bocket, Laurence [Auteur]
Laboratoire de virologie - ULR 3610
Bourlet, Thomas [Auteur]
Hocqueloux, Laurent [Auteur]
Lepiller, Quentin [Auteur]
Maillard, Anne [Auteur]
Reigadas, Sandrine [Auteur]
Barriere, Guillaume [Auteur]
Durand, François [Auteur]
Montes, Brigitte [Auteur]
Stefic, Karl [Auteur]
Marcelin, Anne-Geneviève [Auteur]
Bocket, Laurence [Auteur]
Laboratoire de virologie - ULR 3610
Bourlet, Thomas [Auteur]
Hocqueloux, Laurent [Auteur]
Lepiller, Quentin [Auteur]
Maillard, Anne [Auteur]
Reigadas, Sandrine [Auteur]
Barriere, Guillaume [Auteur]
Durand, François [Auteur]
Montes, Brigitte [Auteur]
Stefic, Karl [Auteur]
Marcelin, Anne-Geneviève [Auteur]
Titre de la revue :
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
Nom court de la revue :
J Antimicrob Chemother
Numéro :
79
Pagination :
578–588
Éditeur :
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Date de publication :
2024-01-23
ISSN :
1460-2091
Mot(s)-clé(s) en anglais :
hiv
mutation
genotype
virology
genotype determination
hiv dna
consensus
voting
mutation
genotype
virology
genotype determination
hiv dna
consensus
voting
Discipline(s) HAL :
Sciences du Vivant [q-bio]
Sciences du Vivant [q-bio]/Microbiologie et Parasitologie/Virologie
Sciences du Vivant [q-bio]/Microbiologie et Parasitologie/Virologie
Résumé en anglais : [en]
Objectives
As many disparities in the clinical use of HIV DNA sequencing are observed, a DELPHI-type consensus was initiated in France to homogenize use, techniques and interpretation of results.
Methods
Based on a ...
Lire la suite >Objectives As many disparities in the clinical use of HIV DNA sequencing are observed, a DELPHI-type consensus was initiated in France to homogenize use, techniques and interpretation of results. Methods Based on a literature review and clinical experience, a steering committee (SC) of eight virologists and one infectious disease specialist formulated statements. Statements were submitted to an independent and anonymous electronic vote of virologists and HIV clinicians in France, between October 2022 and December 2022. Results The SC developed 20 statements grouped into six categories: clinical situations for the use of HIV DNA genotyping; techniques for performing HIV DNA genotyping; consideration of apolipoprotein B mRNA editing enzyme (APOBEC) mutations; genotyping results reporting; recycling of antiretrovirals; and availability of HIV DNA genotyping tests and delays. Twenty-one virologists and 47 clinicians participated in two voting rounds and 18/20 (90%) assertions reached a ‘strong’ consensus. For example, that prior genotyping on HIV DNA is useful for clinical decision-making when considering switching to some long-acting regimens or to reduce the number of antiretroviral agents in virologically suppressed patients for whom RNA data are unavailable/not exploitable/not sufficiently informative. Two statements achieved no consensus: reporting any detected viral minority population for discussion in multidisciplinary meetings (virologists), and possible risk of virological failure when using a second-generation InSTI plus lamivudine or emtricitabine regimen in patients with undetectable viral load within ≥1 year and in the presence of a documented M184V mutation within the last 5 years (clinicians). Conclusions This DELPHI-type consensus will facilitate the strengthening and harmonization of good practice when performing HIV DNA sequencing.Lire moins >
Lire la suite >Objectives As many disparities in the clinical use of HIV DNA sequencing are observed, a DELPHI-type consensus was initiated in France to homogenize use, techniques and interpretation of results. Methods Based on a literature review and clinical experience, a steering committee (SC) of eight virologists and one infectious disease specialist formulated statements. Statements were submitted to an independent and anonymous electronic vote of virologists and HIV clinicians in France, between October 2022 and December 2022. Results The SC developed 20 statements grouped into six categories: clinical situations for the use of HIV DNA genotyping; techniques for performing HIV DNA genotyping; consideration of apolipoprotein B mRNA editing enzyme (APOBEC) mutations; genotyping results reporting; recycling of antiretrovirals; and availability of HIV DNA genotyping tests and delays. Twenty-one virologists and 47 clinicians participated in two voting rounds and 18/20 (90%) assertions reached a ‘strong’ consensus. For example, that prior genotyping on HIV DNA is useful for clinical decision-making when considering switching to some long-acting regimens or to reduce the number of antiretroviral agents in virologically suppressed patients for whom RNA data are unavailable/not exploitable/not sufficiently informative. Two statements achieved no consensus: reporting any detected viral minority population for discussion in multidisciplinary meetings (virologists), and possible risk of virological failure when using a second-generation InSTI plus lamivudine or emtricitabine regimen in patients with undetectable viral load within ≥1 year and in the presence of a documented M184V mutation within the last 5 years (clinicians). Conclusions This DELPHI-type consensus will facilitate the strengthening and harmonization of good practice when performing HIV DNA sequencing.Lire moins >
Langue :
Anglais
Comité de lecture :
Oui
Audience :
Internationale
Vulgarisation :
Non
Établissement(s) :
Université de Lille
CHU Lille
CHU Lille
Collections :
Date de dépôt :
2024-06-08T21:01:21Z
2024-09-27T08:36:34Z
2024-09-27T08:36:34Z
Fichiers
- dkae007.pdf
- Version éditeur
- Accès libre
- Accéder au document