Active Versus Passive Recovery in ...
Type de document :
Article dans une revue scientifique
DOI :
PMID :
URL permanente :
Titre :
Active Versus Passive Recovery in High-Intensity Intermittent Exercises in Children: An Exploratory Study.
Auteur(s) :
Baquet, Georges [Auteur]
Unité de Recherche Pluridisciplinaire Sport, Santé, Société (URePSSS) - ULR 7369 - ULR 4488 [URePSSS]
Dupont, Gregory [Auteur]
Unité de Recherche Pluridisciplinaire Sport, Santé, Société (URePSSS) - ULR 7369 - ULR 4488 [URePSSS]
Gamelin, Francois-Xavier [Auteur]
Unité de Recherche Pluridisciplinaire Sport, Santé, Société (URePSSS) - ULR 7369 - ULR 4488 [URePSSS]
Aucouturier, Julien [Auteur]
Unité de Recherche Pluridisciplinaire Sport, Santé, Société (URePSSS) - EA 7369
Berthoin, Serge [Auteur]
Unité de Recherche Pluridisciplinaire Sport, Santé, Société (URePSSS) - ULR 7369 - ULR 4488 [URePSSS]
Unité de Recherche Pluridisciplinaire Sport, Santé, Société (URePSSS) - ULR 7369 - ULR 4488 [URePSSS]
Dupont, Gregory [Auteur]
Unité de Recherche Pluridisciplinaire Sport, Santé, Société (URePSSS) - ULR 7369 - ULR 4488 [URePSSS]
Gamelin, Francois-Xavier [Auteur]
Unité de Recherche Pluridisciplinaire Sport, Santé, Société (URePSSS) - ULR 7369 - ULR 4488 [URePSSS]
Aucouturier, Julien [Auteur]
Unité de Recherche Pluridisciplinaire Sport, Santé, Société (URePSSS) - EA 7369
Berthoin, Serge [Auteur]
Unité de Recherche Pluridisciplinaire Sport, Santé, Société (URePSSS) - ULR 7369 - ULR 4488 [URePSSS]
Titre de la revue :
Pediatric exercise science
Nom court de la revue :
Pediatr Exerc Sci
Numéro :
31
Pagination :
248-253
Date de publication :
2019-03-24
ISSN :
1543-2920
Mot(s)-clé(s) en anglais :
field tests
maximal oxygen uptake
interval training
aerobic fitness
maximal oxygen uptake
interval training
aerobic fitness
Discipline(s) HAL :
Sciences du Vivant [q-bio]
Résumé en anglais : [en]
This study aimed to compare the effect of active recovery (AR) versus passive recovery (PR) on time to exhaustion and time spent at high percentages of peak oxygen uptake (
) during short, high-intensity intermittent ...
Lire la suite >This study aimed to compare the effect of active recovery (AR) versus passive recovery (PR) on time to exhaustion and time spent at high percentages of peak oxygen uptake ( ) during short, high-intensity intermittent exercises in children. Twelve children (9.5 [0.7] y) underwent a graded test and 2 short, high-intensity intermittent exercises (15 s at 120% of maximal aerobic speed) interspersed with either 15 seconds of AR (50% of maximal aerobic speed) or 15-second PR until exhaustion. A very large effect (effect size = 2.42; 95% confidence interval, 1.32 to 3.52) was observed for time to exhaustion in favor of longer time to exhaustion with PR compared with AR. Trivial or small effect sizes were found for , peakHR, and peak ventilation between PR and AR, while a moderate effect in favor of higher average values (effect size = -0.87; 95% confidence interval, -1.76 to -0.01) was found using AR. The difference between PR and AR for the time spent above 80% (t80%) and 90% (t90%) of was trivial. Despite the shorter running duration in AR, similar t80% and t90% were spent with AR and PR. Time spent at a high percentage of may be attained by running 3-fold shorter using AR compared with using PR.Lire moins >
Lire la suite >This study aimed to compare the effect of active recovery (AR) versus passive recovery (PR) on time to exhaustion and time spent at high percentages of peak oxygen uptake ( ) during short, high-intensity intermittent exercises in children. Twelve children (9.5 [0.7] y) underwent a graded test and 2 short, high-intensity intermittent exercises (15 s at 120% of maximal aerobic speed) interspersed with either 15 seconds of AR (50% of maximal aerobic speed) or 15-second PR until exhaustion. A very large effect (effect size = 2.42; 95% confidence interval, 1.32 to 3.52) was observed for time to exhaustion in favor of longer time to exhaustion with PR compared with AR. Trivial or small effect sizes were found for , peakHR, and peak ventilation between PR and AR, while a moderate effect in favor of higher average values (effect size = -0.87; 95% confidence interval, -1.76 to -0.01) was found using AR. The difference between PR and AR for the time spent above 80% (t80%) and 90% (t90%) of was trivial. Despite the shorter running duration in AR, similar t80% and t90% were spent with AR and PR. Time spent at a high percentage of may be attained by running 3-fold shorter using AR compared with using PR.Lire moins >
Langue :
Anglais
Comité de lecture :
Oui
Audience :
Internationale
Vulgarisation :
Non
Établissement(s) :
Univ. Littoral Côte d’Opale
Univ. Artois
Université de Lille
Univ. Artois
Université de Lille
Équipe(s) de recherche :
Activité Physique, Muscle, Santé (APMS)
Date de dépôt :
2019-09-24T07:27:22Z
2021-11-17T09:39:42Z
2021-12-02T13:24:52Z
2021-11-17T09:39:42Z
2021-12-02T13:24:52Z
Fichiers
- 2019_Baquet_PES.pdf
- Version éditeur
- Accès confidentiel
- Accéder au document