L’État outre-mer
Type de document :
Article dans une revue scientifique: Article original
DOI :
URL permanente :
Titre :
L’État outre-mer
Auteur(s) :
Beauvallet, Willy [Auteur]
Celestine, Audrey [Auteur]
Centre d'Etudes et de Recherches Administratives, Politiques et Sociales - UMR 8026 [CERAPS]
Centre d'Études en Civilisations Langues et Lettres Étrangères (CECILLE) - EA 4074
Roger, Aurélie [Auteur]
Celestine, Audrey [Auteur]
Centre d'Etudes et de Recherches Administratives, Politiques et Sociales - UMR 8026 [CERAPS]
Centre d'Études en Civilisations Langues et Lettres Étrangères (CECILLE) - EA 4074
Roger, Aurélie [Auteur]
Titre de la revue :
Politix
Numéro :
n° 116
Pagination :
139
Éditeur :
CAIRN
Date de publication :
2016
Discipline(s) HAL :
Sciences de l'Homme et Société/Science politique
Résumé en anglais : [en]
The “specificity” of the French overseas territories is both a common wisdom and a shared belief among the various actors involved in politics and the public policies displayed in these regions. However, the term “overseas” ...
Lire la suite >The “specificity” of the French overseas territories is both a common wisdom and a shared belief among the various actors involved in politics and the public policies displayed in these regions. However, the term “overseas” does not designate an objective category. It is the result of a historical and social construction stemming from a variety of social and political mobilizations. In the article, the authors aim to show the institutional construction of a public policy category and its relations to an elite social space they label “the State overseas”. They argue that such a category has grown more autonomous in recent years and that its capacity to defend and represent the interests of the French overseas territories has subsequently strengthened. Furthermore, while there is a general agreement regarding their specificity and exceptionality, the authors argue that both the frontiers and the content of public policies in these regions are still the results of classification and definition struggles.Lire moins >
Lire la suite >The “specificity” of the French overseas territories is both a common wisdom and a shared belief among the various actors involved in politics and the public policies displayed in these regions. However, the term “overseas” does not designate an objective category. It is the result of a historical and social construction stemming from a variety of social and political mobilizations. In the article, the authors aim to show the institutional construction of a public policy category and its relations to an elite social space they label “the State overseas”. They argue that such a category has grown more autonomous in recent years and that its capacity to defend and represent the interests of the French overseas territories has subsequently strengthened. Furthermore, while there is a general agreement regarding their specificity and exceptionality, the authors argue that both the frontiers and the content of public policies in these regions are still the results of classification and definition struggles.Lire moins >
Langue :
Français
Comité de lecture :
Oui
Audience :
Non spécifiée
Établissement(s) :
Université de Lille
CNRS
CNRS
Collections :
Date de dépôt :
2019-10-03T13:12:25Z
2019-10-08T09:01:45Z
2019-12-12T15:22:09Z
2019-12-12T15:24:49Z
2019-10-08T09:01:45Z
2019-12-12T15:22:09Z
2019-12-12T15:24:49Z
Fichiers
- 07.POX 116-Beauvallet-Celestine-Roger.pdf
- Version éditeur
- Accès restreint
- Accéder au document