How reproducible are classical and new ...
Document type :
Article dans une revue scientifique: Article original
PMID :
Permalink :
Title :
How reproducible are classical and new ct-pelvimetry measurements?
Author(s) :
Capelle, C. [Auteur]
Radiologie et Imagerie Musculo-Squelettique [CHU Lille]
Devos, Patrick [Auteur]
Evaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales - ULR 2694 [METRICS]
Caudrelier, C. [Auteur]
Verpillat, P. [Auteur]
Hôpital Jeanne de Flandres
Fourquet, T. [Auteur]
Hôpital Jeanne de Flandres
Puech, Philippe [Auteur]
Thérapies Lasers Assistées par l'Image pour l'Oncologie (ONCO-THAI) - U1189
Thérapies Assistées par Lasers et Immunothérapies pour l'Oncologie - U 1189 [OncoThAI]
Garabedian, Charles [Auteur]
Evaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales - ULR 2694 [METRICS]
Lemaitre, L. [Auteur]
Hôpital Jeanne de Flandres
Radiologie et Imagerie Musculo-Squelettique [CHU Lille]
Devos, Patrick [Auteur]
Evaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales - ULR 2694 [METRICS]
Caudrelier, C. [Auteur]
Verpillat, P. [Auteur]
Hôpital Jeanne de Flandres
Fourquet, T. [Auteur]
Hôpital Jeanne de Flandres
Puech, Philippe [Auteur]
Thérapies Lasers Assistées par l'Image pour l'Oncologie (ONCO-THAI) - U1189
Thérapies Assistées par Lasers et Immunothérapies pour l'Oncologie - U 1189 [OncoThAI]
Garabedian, Charles [Auteur]
Evaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales - ULR 2694 [METRICS]
Lemaitre, L. [Auteur]
Hôpital Jeanne de Flandres
Journal title :
Diagnostic and interventional imaging
Abbreviated title :
Diagn Interv Imaging
Volume number :
101
Pages :
79-89
Publication date :
2019-08-28
ISSN :
2211-5684
HAL domain(s) :
Sciences du Vivant [q-bio]
English abstract : [en]
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the reliability and reproducibility of existing and new computed tomography (CT)-pelvimetry measurements.
METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of 63 women with a mean ...
Show more >OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the reliability and reproducibility of existing and new computed tomography (CT)-pelvimetry measurements. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of 63 women with a mean age of 33.9±5.2 (SD) years (range: 19-49 years) was conducted. Classical pelvimetry measurements were collected including the obstetric conjugate (OC), median transverse diameter (MTD), and interspinous diameter (ISD). Additionally, we used multiplanar reconstruction (MPR) mode to define two oblique planes: inlet pelvic plane (IPP) and mid-pelvic plane (MPP) and measure new pelvic parameters, including anteroposterior (APD), transverse diameters and circumference of both IPP and MPP (inletAPD, inletMTD, inletCIRC and midAPD, ISD, midCIRC, respectively). The reproducibility (intra- and inter-observer) of our results were assessed. Multivariate analyses using principal component analysis and clustering methods were conducted to analyze the association between pelvimetry measurements and identify patient sub-groups. RESULTS: All linear measurements (OC, inletAPD, MTD, inletMTD, midAPD, and ISD) showed statistically "almost perfect" intra- and inter-observer correlation coefficients (range: 0.924-0.980). Circumferences (inletCIRC and midCIRC) showed statistically "almost perfect" intra- (range: 0.847-0.857) and inter-observer correlation coefficients (range: 0.923-0.957). The measurement of 6 pelvimetric parameters allowed determining three groups of pelvis size. CONCLUSIONS: New pelvic measurements have excellent reproducibility and are similar to the classical measurements, based on the MPR analysis of CT planes adjusted to the inner bony pelvis.Show less >
Show more >OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the reliability and reproducibility of existing and new computed tomography (CT)-pelvimetry measurements. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of 63 women with a mean age of 33.9±5.2 (SD) years (range: 19-49 years) was conducted. Classical pelvimetry measurements were collected including the obstetric conjugate (OC), median transverse diameter (MTD), and interspinous diameter (ISD). Additionally, we used multiplanar reconstruction (MPR) mode to define two oblique planes: inlet pelvic plane (IPP) and mid-pelvic plane (MPP) and measure new pelvic parameters, including anteroposterior (APD), transverse diameters and circumference of both IPP and MPP (inletAPD, inletMTD, inletCIRC and midAPD, ISD, midCIRC, respectively). The reproducibility (intra- and inter-observer) of our results were assessed. Multivariate analyses using principal component analysis and clustering methods were conducted to analyze the association between pelvimetry measurements and identify patient sub-groups. RESULTS: All linear measurements (OC, inletAPD, MTD, inletMTD, midAPD, and ISD) showed statistically "almost perfect" intra- and inter-observer correlation coefficients (range: 0.924-0.980). Circumferences (inletCIRC and midCIRC) showed statistically "almost perfect" intra- (range: 0.847-0.857) and inter-observer correlation coefficients (range: 0.923-0.957). The measurement of 6 pelvimetric parameters allowed determining three groups of pelvis size. CONCLUSIONS: New pelvic measurements have excellent reproducibility and are similar to the classical measurements, based on the MPR analysis of CT planes adjusted to the inner bony pelvis.Show less >
Language :
Anglais
Audience :
Internationale
Popular science :
Non
Administrative institution(s) :
CHU Lille
Inserm
Université de Lille
Inserm
Université de Lille
Submission date :
2019-12-09T16:47:53Z
2020-01-17T15:51:29Z
2021-04-26T13:04:00Z
2020-01-17T15:51:29Z
2021-04-26T13:04:00Z
Files
- DII-Capelle-2020.pdf
- Version éditeur
- Confidential access
- Access the document