Do medical practitioners trust automated ...
Document type :
Article dans une revue scientifique: Article original
DOI :
PMID :
Permalink :
Title :
Do medical practitioners trust automated interpretation of electrocardiograms?
Author(s) :
Delrot, Cedric [Auteur]
Evaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales - ULR 2694 [METRICS]
Bouzille, Guillaume [Auteur]
Laboratoire Traitement du Signal et de l'Image [LTSI]
Calafiore, Matthieu [Auteur]
Evaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales - ULR 2694 [METRICS]
Rochoy, Michael [Auteur]
Troubles cognitifs dégénératifs et vasculaires - U 1171 - EA 1046 [TCDV]
Legrand, Bertrand [Auteur]
Evaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales - ULR 2694 [METRICS]
Ficheur, Gregoire [Auteur]
Evaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales - ULR 2694 [METRICS]
Chazard, Emmanuel [Auteur]
Evaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales - ULR 2694 [METRICS]
Evaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales - ULR 2694 [METRICS]
Bouzille, Guillaume [Auteur]
Laboratoire Traitement du Signal et de l'Image [LTSI]
Calafiore, Matthieu [Auteur]

Evaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales - ULR 2694 [METRICS]
Rochoy, Michael [Auteur]
Troubles cognitifs dégénératifs et vasculaires - U 1171 - EA 1046 [TCDV]
Legrand, Bertrand [Auteur]
Evaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales - ULR 2694 [METRICS]
Ficheur, Gregoire [Auteur]

Evaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales - ULR 2694 [METRICS]
Chazard, Emmanuel [Auteur]

Evaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales - ULR 2694 [METRICS]
Journal title :
Studies in health technology and informatics
Abbreviated title :
Stud Health Technol Inform
Volume number :
264
Pages :
536-540
Publication date :
2019-08-21
ISSN :
1879-8365
HAL domain(s) :
Sciences du Vivant [q-bio]
English abstract : [en]
The objective is to study the way physicians use the ECG computerized interpretation (ECG-CI). Anonymous questionnaires were mailed to 282 primary care physicians (PCPs) and 140 cardiologists in France. 225 complete surveys ...
Show more >The objective is to study the way physicians use the ECG computerized interpretation (ECG-CI). Anonymous questionnaires were mailed to 282 primary care physicians (PCPs) and 140 cardiologists in France. 225 complete surveys were analyzed. PCPs performed a median of 5 ECGs per month, vs. 200 ECGs for cardiologists. Among PCPs with ECG, 57% felt confident about their skills in interpreting ECGs. Whereas 91.7% of cardiologists first interpreted the ECG by themselves, 27.9% of PCPs first read the computerized interpretation. PCPs found that ECG-CI was more reliable than cardiologists did for atrial or ventricular hypertrophy. PCPs and cardiologists agreed that ECG-CI was reliable for conduction troubles and "normal ECG" statement, but was not for other rhythm or repolarization troubles. PCPs are less experienced with ECG interpretation, but are also more likely to trust the computerized interpretation, whereas those interpreters are not fully reliable.Show less >
Show more >The objective is to study the way physicians use the ECG computerized interpretation (ECG-CI). Anonymous questionnaires were mailed to 282 primary care physicians (PCPs) and 140 cardiologists in France. 225 complete surveys were analyzed. PCPs performed a median of 5 ECGs per month, vs. 200 ECGs for cardiologists. Among PCPs with ECG, 57% felt confident about their skills in interpreting ECGs. Whereas 91.7% of cardiologists first interpreted the ECG by themselves, 27.9% of PCPs first read the computerized interpretation. PCPs found that ECG-CI was more reliable than cardiologists did for atrial or ventricular hypertrophy. PCPs and cardiologists agreed that ECG-CI was reliable for conduction troubles and "normal ECG" statement, but was not for other rhythm or repolarization troubles. PCPs are less experienced with ECG interpretation, but are also more likely to trust the computerized interpretation, whereas those interpreters are not fully reliable.Show less >
Language :
Anglais
Audience :
Internationale
Popular science :
Non
Administrative institution(s) :
CHU Lille
Université de Lille
Université de Lille
Submission date :
2019-12-09T16:47:56Z
2021-05-31T09:49:27Z
2021-05-31T09:49:27Z