Prenatal parental involvement in decision ...
Document type :
Article dans une revue scientifique: Article original
PMID :
Permalink :
Title :
Prenatal parental involvement in decision for delivery room management at 22-26 weeks of gestation in france - the epipage-2 cohort study
Author(s) :
Levaillant, Cerise [Auteur]
Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire [CHU Lille] [CHRU Lille]
Caeymaex, Laurence [Auteur]
Centre d'Etudes des discours, Images, Textes, Ecrits, Communications [CEDITEC]
Behal, Helene [Auteur]
Evaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales - ULR 2694 [METRICS]
Kaminski, Monique [Auteur]
Equipe 1 : EPOPé - Épidémiologie Obstétricale, Périnatale et Pédiatrique [CRESS - U1153]
Diguisto, Caroline [Auteur]
Tosello, Barthelemy [Auteur]
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Marseille [APHM]
Azria, Elie [Auteur]
Equipe 1 : EPOPé - Épidémiologie Obstétricale, Périnatale et Pédiatrique [CRESS - U1153]
Claris, Olivier [Auteur]
Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 [UCBL]
Betremieux, Pierre [Auteur]
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rennes [CHU Rennes] = Rennes University Hospital [Pontchaillou]
Foix-L'helias, Laurence [Auteur]
Equipe 1 : EPOPé - Épidémiologie Obstétricale, Périnatale et Pédiatrique [CRESS - U1153]
Truffert, Patrick [Auteur]
METRICS : Evaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales - ULR 2694
Evaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales - ULR 2694 [METRICS]
Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire [CHU Lille] [CHRU Lille]
Caeymaex, Laurence [Auteur]
Centre d'Etudes des discours, Images, Textes, Ecrits, Communications [CEDITEC]
Behal, Helene [Auteur]
Evaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales - ULR 2694 [METRICS]
Kaminski, Monique [Auteur]
Equipe 1 : EPOPé - Épidémiologie Obstétricale, Périnatale et Pédiatrique [CRESS - U1153]
Diguisto, Caroline [Auteur]
Tosello, Barthelemy [Auteur]
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Marseille [APHM]
Azria, Elie [Auteur]
Equipe 1 : EPOPé - Épidémiologie Obstétricale, Périnatale et Pédiatrique [CRESS - U1153]
Claris, Olivier [Auteur]
Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 [UCBL]
Betremieux, Pierre [Auteur]
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rennes [CHU Rennes] = Rennes University Hospital [Pontchaillou]
Foix-L'helias, Laurence [Auteur]
Equipe 1 : EPOPé - Épidémiologie Obstétricale, Périnatale et Pédiatrique [CRESS - U1153]
Truffert, Patrick [Auteur]
METRICS : Evaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales - ULR 2694
Evaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales - ULR 2694 [METRICS]
Journal title :
PLoS One
Abbreviated title :
PLoS ONE
Volume number :
14
Pages :
e0221859
Publication date :
2019-01-01
ISSN :
1932-6203
HAL domain(s) :
Sciences du Vivant [q-bio]
English abstract : [en]
OBJECTIVE: Our main objective was to examine if parental prenatal preferences predict delivery-room management of extremely preterm periviable infants. The secondary objectives were to describe parental involvement and the ...
Show more >OBJECTIVE: Our main objective was to examine if parental prenatal preferences predict delivery-room management of extremely preterm periviable infants. The secondary objectives were to describe parental involvement and the content of prenatal counseling given to parents for this prenatal decision. METHODS: Prospective study of neonates liveborn between 22 and 26 weeks of gestation in France in 2011 among the neonates included in the EPIPAGE-2 study. METHODS: 18 centers participating in the "Extreme Prematurity Group" substudy of the EPIPAGE-2 study. METHODS: 302 neonates liveborn between 22-26 weeks among which 113 with known parental preferences while parental preferences were unknown or unavailable for 186 and delivery room management was missing for 3. RESULTS: Data on prenatal counseling and parental preferences were collected by a questionnaire completed by professionals who cared for the baby at birth; delivery room (DR) management, classified as stabilization or initiation of resuscitation (SIR) vs comfort care (CC). The 113 neonates studied had a mean (SD) gestational age of 24 (0.1) weeks. Parents of neonates in the CC group preferred SIR less frequently than those with neonates in the SIR group (16% vs 88%, p < .001). After multivariate analysis, preference for SIR was an independent factor associated with this management. Professionals qualified decisions as shared (81%), exclusively medical (16%) or parental (3%). Information was described as medical with no personal opinion (71%), complete (75%) and generally pessimistic (54%). CONCLUSIONS: Parental involvement in prenatal decision-making did not reach satisfying rates in the studied setting. When available, prenatal parental preference was a determining factor for DR management of extremely preterm neonates. Potential biases in the content of prenatal counselling given to parents need to be evaluated.Show less >
Show more >OBJECTIVE: Our main objective was to examine if parental prenatal preferences predict delivery-room management of extremely preterm periviable infants. The secondary objectives were to describe parental involvement and the content of prenatal counseling given to parents for this prenatal decision. METHODS: Prospective study of neonates liveborn between 22 and 26 weeks of gestation in France in 2011 among the neonates included in the EPIPAGE-2 study. METHODS: 18 centers participating in the "Extreme Prematurity Group" substudy of the EPIPAGE-2 study. METHODS: 302 neonates liveborn between 22-26 weeks among which 113 with known parental preferences while parental preferences were unknown or unavailable for 186 and delivery room management was missing for 3. RESULTS: Data on prenatal counseling and parental preferences were collected by a questionnaire completed by professionals who cared for the baby at birth; delivery room (DR) management, classified as stabilization or initiation of resuscitation (SIR) vs comfort care (CC). The 113 neonates studied had a mean (SD) gestational age of 24 (0.1) weeks. Parents of neonates in the CC group preferred SIR less frequently than those with neonates in the SIR group (16% vs 88%, p < .001). After multivariate analysis, preference for SIR was an independent factor associated with this management. Professionals qualified decisions as shared (81%), exclusively medical (16%) or parental (3%). Information was described as medical with no personal opinion (71%), complete (75%) and generally pessimistic (54%). CONCLUSIONS: Parental involvement in prenatal decision-making did not reach satisfying rates in the studied setting. When available, prenatal parental preference was a determining factor for DR management of extremely preterm neonates. Potential biases in the content of prenatal counselling given to parents need to be evaluated.Show less >
Language :
Anglais
Audience :
Internationale
Popular science :
Non
Administrative institution(s) :
CHU Lille
Université de Lille
Université de Lille
Submission date :
2019-12-09T16:50:47Z
2020-03-26T10:06:21Z
2020-03-26T10:08:33Z
2020-03-26T10:06:21Z
2020-03-26T10:08:33Z
Files
- journal.pone.0221859.pdf
- Version éditeur
- Open access
- Access the document