Is the simplification of the immunization ...
Document type :
Article dans une revue scientifique: Article de synthèse/Review paper
PMID :
Permalink :
Title :
Is the simplification of the immunization schedule applied? review 2 years after its implementation
Author(s) :
Gaudelus, J. [Auteur]
Denis, F. [Auteur]
Cohen, Robert [Auteur]
Stahl, J. -P. [Auteur]
Pujol, P. [Auteur]
Gauthier, E. [Auteur]
Martinot, Alain [Auteur]
Evaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales - ULR 2694 [METRICS]
Denis, F. [Auteur]
Cohen, Robert [Auteur]
Stahl, J. -P. [Auteur]
Pujol, P. [Auteur]
Gauthier, E. [Auteur]
Martinot, Alain [Auteur]

Evaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales - ULR 2694 [METRICS]
Journal title :
Archives de pediatrie . organe officiel de la Societe francaise de pediatrie
Abbreviated title :
Arch. Pediatr.
Volume number :
23
Pages :
1012-1017
Publication date :
2016-10-01
ISSN :
0929-693X
HAL domain(s) :
Sciences du Vivant [q-bio]
English abstract : [en]
Repeating evaluations of vaccine coverage (VC) is essential to measure the implementation and effectiveness of vaccination policy. We report the results of VC in infants from the Vaccinoscopie®
METHODS: Study conducted on ...
Show more >Repeating evaluations of vaccine coverage (VC) is essential to measure the implementation and effectiveness of vaccination policy. We report the results of VC in infants from the Vaccinoscopie® METHODS: Study conducted on Internet among a representative sample of mothers reporting their child's vaccination record. RESULTS: The removal of the dose of DTPa-Hib at the age of 3 months was quickly adopted since only 1 % of children aged 6 months had received three doses of DTPa in 2014 compared to 96 % in 2012. The booster dose is administered earlier for the DTPa and hepatitis B components. The shift of MMR vaccination from 9 months of age for children participating in community structures to 12 months for all children was closely followed since only 2 % of 9- to 11-month-old children received a MMR vaccine in 2014 compared to 33 % in 2012. The second dose of MMR recommended at 16-18 months of age rather than between 13 and 24 months was actually followed by an earlier administration of this dose. At 18-20 months of age, 60 % received two doses of MMR in 2014 versus 41 % in 2012. Finally, for meningitis C vaccination, a significant increase of VC was observed in children 15-23 months of age (66 % in 2014 versus 44 % in 2012). CONCLUSIONS: The simplification of the infant immunization schedule was quickly applied and received excellent support from healthcare professionals. However, this measure alone is still not sufficient to meet the CV objectives defined by the HCSP.Show less >
Show more >Repeating evaluations of vaccine coverage (VC) is essential to measure the implementation and effectiveness of vaccination policy. We report the results of VC in infants from the Vaccinoscopie® METHODS: Study conducted on Internet among a representative sample of mothers reporting their child's vaccination record. RESULTS: The removal of the dose of DTPa-Hib at the age of 3 months was quickly adopted since only 1 % of children aged 6 months had received three doses of DTPa in 2014 compared to 96 % in 2012. The booster dose is administered earlier for the DTPa and hepatitis B components. The shift of MMR vaccination from 9 months of age for children participating in community structures to 12 months for all children was closely followed since only 2 % of 9- to 11-month-old children received a MMR vaccine in 2014 compared to 33 % in 2012. The second dose of MMR recommended at 16-18 months of age rather than between 13 and 24 months was actually followed by an earlier administration of this dose. At 18-20 months of age, 60 % received two doses of MMR in 2014 versus 41 % in 2012. Finally, for meningitis C vaccination, a significant increase of VC was observed in children 15-23 months of age (66 % in 2014 versus 44 % in 2012). CONCLUSIONS: The simplification of the infant immunization schedule was quickly applied and received excellent support from healthcare professionals. However, this measure alone is still not sufficient to meet the CV objectives defined by the HCSP.Show less >
Language :
Anglais
Audience :
Internationale
Popular science :
Non
Administrative institution(s) :
CHU Lille
Université de Lille
Université de Lille
Submission date :
2019-12-09T16:54:12Z