Titre :

Randomized controlled trial on promoting influenza vaccination in general practice waiting rooms

Auteur(s) :

Berkhout, Christophe [Auteur]
Université de Lille
Willefert-Bouche, Amy [Auteur]
Université de Lille
Chazard, Emmanuel [Auteur]
Evaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales - ULR 2694 [METRICS]
Zgorska-Maynard-Moussa, Suzanna [Auteur]
Université de Lille
Favre, Jonathan [Auteur]
Université de Lille
Peremans, Lieve [Auteur]
Universiteit Antwerpen = University of Antwerpen [Antwerpen]
Ficheur, Gregoire [Auteur]
Evaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales - ULR 2694 [METRICS]
Van Royen, Paul [Auteur]
Universiteit Antwerpen = University of Antwerpen [Antwerpen]

Titre de la revue :

PLoS One

Nom court de la revue :

PLoS ONE

Numéro :

13

Pagination :

e0192155

Date de publication :

2018-01-01

ISSN :

1932-6203

Mot(s)-clé(s) en anglais :

Mesh:General Practice*
Mesh:Female
Mesh:Aged
Mesh:Male
Mesh:Influenza Vaccines/administration & dosage*
Mesh:Humans
Mesh:Middle Aged
Mesh:France

Discipline(s) HAL :

Sciences du Vivant [q-bio]

Résumé en anglais : [en]

Most of general practitioners (GPs) use advertising in their waiting rooms for patient's education purposes. Patients vaccinated against seasonal influenza have been gradually lessening. The objective of this trial was to ...
Lire la suite >Most of general practitioners (GPs) use advertising in their waiting rooms for patient's education purposes. Patients vaccinated against seasonal influenza have been gradually lessening. The objective of this trial was to assess the effect of an advertising campaign for influenza vaccination using posters and pamphlets in GPs' waiting rooms. Registry based 2/1 cluster randomized controlled trial, a cluster gathering the enlisted patients of 75 GPs aged over 16 years. The trial, run during the 2014-2015 influenza vaccination campaign, compared patient's awareness from being in 50 GPs' standard waiting rooms (control group) versus that of waiting in 25 rooms from GPs who had received and exposed pamphlets and one poster on influenza vaccine (intervention group), in addition to standard mandatory information. The main outcome was the number of vaccination units delivered in pharmacies. Data were extracted from the SIAM-ERASME claim database of the Health Insurance Fund of Lille-Douai (France). The association between the intervention (yes/no) and the main outcome was assessed through a generalized estimating equation. Seventy-five GPs enrolled 10,597 patients over 65 years or suffering from long lasting diseases (intervention/control as of 3781/6816 patients) from October 15, 2014 to February 28, 2015. No difference was found regarding the number of influenza vaccination units delivered (Relative Risk (RR) = 1.01; 95% Confidence interval: 0.97 to 1.05; p = 0.561). Effects of the monothematic campaign promoting vaccination against influenza using a poster and pamphlets exposed in GPs' waiting rooms could not be demonstrated.Lire moins >

Langue :

Anglais

Audience :

Internationale

Vulgarisation :

Non

Établissement(s) :

CHU Lille
Université de Lille

Collections :

• METRICS : Evaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales - ULR 2694

Date de dépôt :

2019-12-09T16:55:25Z
2020-04-06T08:46:07Z
2020-04-06T08:47:22Z