Contact aspiration versus stent retriever ...
Document type :
Article dans une revue scientifique: Article original
PMID :
Permalink :
Title :
Contact aspiration versus stent retriever in patients with acute ischemic stroke with m2 occlusion in the aster randomized trial (contact aspiration versus stent retriever for successful revascularization)
Author(s) :
Gory, Benjamin [Auteur]
Département de neuroradiologie diagnostique et thérapeutique [CHRU Nancy]
Lapergue, Bertrand [Auteur]
Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines [UVSQ]
Blanc, Raphael [Auteur]
Labreuche, Julien [Auteur]
Evaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales - ULR 2694 [METRICS]
Ben Maacha, Malek [Auteur]
Hôpital Fondation Adolphe de Rothschild = Adolphe de Rothschild Foundation Hospital
Duhamel, Alain [Auteur]
Evaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales - ULR 2694 [METRICS]
Marnat, Gaultier [Auteur]
Saleme, Suzana [Auteur]
Costalat, Vincent [Auteur]
Bracard, Serge [Auteur]
Desal, Hubert [Auteur]
Mazighi, Mikael [Auteur]
Consoli, Arturo [Auteur]
Piotin, Michel [Auteur]
Hôpital Fondation Adolphe de Rothschild = Adolphe de Rothschild Foundation Hospital
Département de neuroradiologie diagnostique et thérapeutique [CHRU Nancy]
Lapergue, Bertrand [Auteur]
Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines [UVSQ]
Blanc, Raphael [Auteur]
Labreuche, Julien [Auteur]
Evaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales - ULR 2694 [METRICS]
Ben Maacha, Malek [Auteur]
Hôpital Fondation Adolphe de Rothschild = Adolphe de Rothschild Foundation Hospital
Duhamel, Alain [Auteur]
Evaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales - ULR 2694 [METRICS]
Marnat, Gaultier [Auteur]
Saleme, Suzana [Auteur]
Costalat, Vincent [Auteur]
Bracard, Serge [Auteur]
Desal, Hubert [Auteur]
Mazighi, Mikael [Auteur]
Consoli, Arturo [Auteur]
Piotin, Michel [Auteur]
Hôpital Fondation Adolphe de Rothschild = Adolphe de Rothschild Foundation Hospital
Journal title :
Stroke
Abbreviated title :
Stroke
Volume number :
49
Pages :
461-464
Publisher :
American Heart Association
Publication date :
2017-12-01
ISSN :
0039-2499
English keyword(s) :
stent retriever
safety
confidence intervals
aspiration
cerebral hemorrhage
stroke
thrombectomy
safety
confidence intervals
aspiration
cerebral hemorrhage
stroke
thrombectomy
HAL domain(s) :
Sciences du Vivant [q-bio]
English abstract : [en]
Middle cerebral artery M2-segment occlusions represent an important subgroup of patients with acute stroke with large-vessel occlusion. The safety of mechanical thrombectomy, especially contact aspiration (CA), in such ...
Show more >Middle cerebral artery M2-segment occlusions represent an important subgroup of patients with acute stroke with large-vessel occlusion. The safety of mechanical thrombectomy, especially contact aspiration (CA), in such distal intracranial occlusions is still under debate. We compared reperfusion, adverse events, neurological recovery, and functional outcome of patients with isolated M2 occlusions according to the first-line strategy mechanical thrombectomy devices (CA versus stent retriever [SR]). This is a post hoc analysis of the ASTER trial (Contact Aspiration Versus Stent Retriever for Successful Revascularization). The primary outcome was successful reperfusion at the end of all endovascular procedures, defined as modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) scores 2b/3. Secondary outcomes were mTICI 2c/3 and mTICI 3, 90-day functional outcome, assessed with the modified Rankin Scale score. Safety outcomes included 90-day mortality and any symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage. Seventy-nine patients were included: 48 were allocated to the CA group and 31 to the SR group. There were no significant differences between CA and SR groups in reperfusion after all endovascular procedures regarding mTICI 2b/3 (89.6% versus 83.9%; PPPPP First-line mechanical thrombectomy with CA compared with SR did not result in an increased successful revascularization rate in patients with acute stroke with isolated M2 occlusion.Show less >
Show more >Middle cerebral artery M2-segment occlusions represent an important subgroup of patients with acute stroke with large-vessel occlusion. The safety of mechanical thrombectomy, especially contact aspiration (CA), in such distal intracranial occlusions is still under debate. We compared reperfusion, adverse events, neurological recovery, and functional outcome of patients with isolated M2 occlusions according to the first-line strategy mechanical thrombectomy devices (CA versus stent retriever [SR]). This is a post hoc analysis of the ASTER trial (Contact Aspiration Versus Stent Retriever for Successful Revascularization). The primary outcome was successful reperfusion at the end of all endovascular procedures, defined as modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) scores 2b/3. Secondary outcomes were mTICI 2c/3 and mTICI 3, 90-day functional outcome, assessed with the modified Rankin Scale score. Safety outcomes included 90-day mortality and any symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage. Seventy-nine patients were included: 48 were allocated to the CA group and 31 to the SR group. There were no significant differences between CA and SR groups in reperfusion after all endovascular procedures regarding mTICI 2b/3 (89.6% versus 83.9%; PPPPP First-line mechanical thrombectomy with CA compared with SR did not result in an increased successful revascularization rate in patients with acute stroke with isolated M2 occlusion.Show less >
Language :
Anglais
Audience :
Internationale
Popular science :
Non
Administrative institution(s) :
CHU Lille
Université de Lille
Université de Lille
Submission date :
2019-12-09T18:17:47Z
2024-03-22T07:58:27Z
2024-03-22T07:58:27Z
Files
- gory-et-al-2017-contact-aspiration-versus-stent-retriever-in-patients-with-acute-ischemic-stroke-with-m2-occlusion-in.pdf
- Version éditeur
- Restricted access
- Access the document