Standard or specific unit costs: which ...
Type de document :
Article dans une revue scientifique: Article de synthèse/Review paper
PMID :
URL permanente :
Titre :
Standard or specific unit costs: which criteria for choosing an economic evaluation of health strategies in multicentric studies?
Auteur(s) :
Titre de la revue :
Revue d'epidemiologie et de sante publique
Nom court de la revue :
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique
Date de publication :
2018-03-08
ISSN :
0398-7620
Mot(s)-clé(s) en anglais :
Hospital
Cost
Evaluation
Technology
Guidelines
Production
Cost
Evaluation
Technology
Guidelines
Production
Discipline(s) HAL :
Sciences du Vivant [q-bio]
Résumé en anglais : [en]
The question of what monetary value should be assigned to consumed resources, that is to say the choice of the unit cost, is a major consideration in terms of impact on the cost analysis results. To date, no agreement has ...
Lire la suite >The question of what monetary value should be assigned to consumed resources, that is to say the choice of the unit cost, is a major consideration in terms of impact on the cost analysis results. To date, no agreement has been reached regarding this methodological question. The choices made by methodologists and the subsequent impact on the results of the analysis are only rarely put forward. This work addresses the theoretical framework of health strategy evaluations that can be carried out either in the normative framework of the conventional economic approach of well-being, referred to as welfarist, or in that of an approach referred to as extra-welfarist. It also provides elements that help clarify the choice of the hospital unit costs used to calculate the cost of health strategies, so as to reconcile the use of such studies and improve their comparability. What is preferable, opting for specific per hospital unit costs or applying a standard unit cost to all facilities? How should a standard cost be calculated? Is it appropriate to calculate an average of the unit costs, as recommended by certain guidelines? The advantages and the limitations of the various modes of assessing hospital resources in the setting of multicentric trials are discussed.Lire moins >
Lire la suite >The question of what monetary value should be assigned to consumed resources, that is to say the choice of the unit cost, is a major consideration in terms of impact on the cost analysis results. To date, no agreement has been reached regarding this methodological question. The choices made by methodologists and the subsequent impact on the results of the analysis are only rarely put forward. This work addresses the theoretical framework of health strategy evaluations that can be carried out either in the normative framework of the conventional economic approach of well-being, referred to as welfarist, or in that of an approach referred to as extra-welfarist. It also provides elements that help clarify the choice of the hospital unit costs used to calculate the cost of health strategies, so as to reconcile the use of such studies and improve their comparability. What is preferable, opting for specific per hospital unit costs or applying a standard unit cost to all facilities? How should a standard cost be calculated? Is it appropriate to calculate an average of the unit costs, as recommended by certain guidelines? The advantages and the limitations of the various modes of assessing hospital resources in the setting of multicentric trials are discussed.Lire moins >
Langue :
Anglais
Audience :
Internationale
Vulgarisation :
Non
Établissement(s) :
CHU Lille
Université de Lille
Université de Lille
Date de dépôt :
2019-12-09T18:18:03Z